High Court Kerala High Court

P.K.Rajendran vs T.R.Vijayakumar on 19 December, 2008

Kerala High Court
P.K.Rajendran vs T.R.Vijayakumar on 19 December, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 4133 of 2008()



1. P.K.RAJENDRAN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. T.R.VIJAYAKUMAR
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.PREMOD

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :19/12/2008

 O R D E R
                M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.
                   ------------------------------------------
                    CRL.R.P. NO. 4133 OF 2008
                   ------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 19th day of December, 2008


                               O R D E R

Revision petitioner is the accused and first respondent

the complainant in S.T.1547 of 2005 on the file of Judicial First

Class Magistrate-I, Kottayam. Revision petitioner was convicted

and sentenced for the offence under section 138 of Negotiable

Instruments Act. He challenged the conviction before Additional

Sessions Court, Kottayam in Crl. Appeal 125 of 2007. Learned

Additional Sessions Judge on reappreciation of evidence

confirmed the conviction but modified the sentence to

imprisonment till rising of Court and a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and

in default simple imprisonment for four months with a direction

to pay the fine on realisation to first respondent as

compensation. Revision is filed challenging the conviction.

2. Learned counsel appearing for revision petitioner is

not challenging the conviction or sentence but only seeks time

for payment of the amount.

3. On going through the judgments of the Courts below,

I find no reason to interfere with the conviction or the sentence.

CRRP4133/08 2

Evidence establish that revision petitioner issued the

dishonoured cheque towards the discharge of a legal liability

and it was dishonoured for want of sufficient funds and first

respondent had complied with all the statutory formalities

provided under section 138 and 142 of Negotiable Instruments

Act. Learned Sessions Judge modified the sentence to

imprisonment till rising of Court and fine which was only for the

amount covered by the dishonoured cheque. In such

circumstances there is no merit in the revision.

Revision is dismissed. Revision petitioner is granted five

months time to pay the fine. Revision petitioner is directed to

appear before the Magistrate on 20.5.2009.

M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,
JUDGE

Okb/-