IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA, BAN'QvAVL'§RE7v..
DATED '1'¥~£IS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE;,. f§.05§:.
BEFoR r;~ 4 1'
THE §0N'Bm MR. JUS'riQE
WRIT PETITION No 1 6';3.97 or 2095 T{'c3h}:AgA€:).
WP. No. 49427/04 {_§v£~{i~.A(3)_&, CR"'"13'*.6§£3['O6
In wp 1639'?[06:
BETWEEN: V . '
1 SR1 M3!'-..sUs'_3*B_w1AH' «S110 LATE BA§'HRA:AH SETTY
AGE33 ABf)U"T'5:3_8 "1"--EZ'.AF€S_: «
R/AT HV0s:i.pU1?GA VJLLAGEY N HOSAKOPTE
H<)'B;:I,1",1;'PAV;mADA-TALUK,' "
':€UM;<U§:.$*:*R§:?_r';" - . '
2 sR1"sA*mYANARAYANA $10 LATE BADHRAIAH SE'I"I'Y
V AGED" A3013'? 4E:1_Y"E§ARS,
3 RfAT H(}E'2ADURC}A VILLAGEY N HOSAKGPTE
HQBAL1, PAv'~
BRANc1{VorsF'1cE, {}.MUDDAPPA CXJMPLEX,
VIVEI-;:AN.ANi5A'.:rou;T-NVL,'*~-- 1 , . '
'rUMKU.R'-£}:';3TR2(:1f, ..
R.E'P:*%EsENT'E:::3-- B"?-'.>l"I.'S BRP.N'CH MANAGER.
SM?' hkIALLA}\?ii.\?IA BADRAIAH SETTY
AGED.__ABOUT as Y.E'ARs,
R,/AT HOSAD¥JR{}A 'VILLAGE,
. N. HOSAKQTE HOBALI,
- PAVAGAQA TALUK,
TUMKURVDISTRICF.
"'.._.é,1\.v:€i"_~sA'15m%ABI~»;Ars4sA I)/O LATE BADHRAIAH SETTY
A AG_1:,§ ABOUT 54 YEARS,
R;A'1"HOSADURGA v:LLA<:;E,
'i'.N;;.HOSAKGTE HOBALI,
PAVAGADA TALU K,
'A "~_.'I'UMKUR D£S'I'R!CT.
SM'? VARALAKSHPVR D] O LATE BADHRAIAH SE'I"}"Y
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
R/AT HOSADURGA VILLAGE,
Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBALI,
PAVAGADA TALU K,
TUMKUR I3iS'I'RICI'.
RES?()NDEN'Z'S.
R/O HOSADURGA VILLAGE
Y N HOSKOTE I-IOBLI
PAVAGADA TALSKA
VARALAKASHMI @ VARALAMMA' . .
1:;/0 LATE HANUMAKKA '
W/C) NAGARAJA
AGED ABOUT 45. YEARS?
R/O HGSADURGA VILLAGr_E"~~
Y N HOSKOTE HOBLI '
PAVAGAIDA TALUKA
RAMAMURTHY T --
S/O LATE HANUMAKKA
AGEDABOUT_41YE'ARS1 . .,
R/O H0sA'mJ_RGA==vILLAGE V.
Y N HQs1<Q*1*Jg_1e{0s3:,i L'
PAVA<é»AD;1"TALUKA=if;- " , V'
PETITIONERS.
(By Sri 9 4BALL,«}\':'é§j_&'z=;s§sm::1ATEs, ADV.)
AND
..... .. V
xv/"'0 LA'I'.__E S NAGARAJAPPA
" 'V5335 5301;? 35 YEARS
~ . R/"'OfNVAG.ARAMGERE, CHALLAKERE TALUK
A "CHITRAf_D?JRGA DIST
"sA'"r':3i}{'
S] Q LATE S NAGARAJAPPA
" «Agfin ABOUT 17 YEARS, MINOR
= RI 0 NAGARAMGERE, CHALLAKERE TALUK
CHITRADURGA DIST
REP BY THEIR N/G MOTHER BHAGYAMMA
MANJULA
D)' O LATE S NAGARAJA§'?A
AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, MINOR
R] O NAGARAMGERE, CHALLAKERE '}'ALUK
PAVAGADA TALUK
TUMKUR SISTRIC?
6 Sm SATHYABHAMA V »
I3/O LATE BADRAIAH SE'I"I'¥f
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS . --
R/0F HOSADURGA VILLAGE '
Y.N HOSAKOTE HOBALI
PAVAGAEA TALUK *
TUMKUR DISTRICT
'7 Sm' VARALAKSPENEE _ .
13/0 LATE l3AI}RAlA§4l'S1'E-TE'Tf{ _
AGED ABQ1UT49AY13;ARs'._ » "
R/01:' HQSADURGA ViLLAGE--.. '
ms: HoSAi'%;ioTm~iQ1'3A'L1 "
»
'I'Um<_U::§.?_ 1j;$:s'I*§2i<:1*viVv%A '_
. .... "<:..,. ...RESPONI)EN'I'S
(By 35. R'-RAJQ§C%{;'-.I§Ai;1X'M;'ADM4;
SR1 .3A¥APRAmS§:{t .A£}~X{;' FOR 12.4;
SR1 K.B:-1jH1?PEswAMy"_.;ADv. FOR R. 3.)
'If$~iIs;~';v%.AcR1$¥"1's*--FILEG U/S315 op cps AGAINST THE
' OREER VDT4E-2.9.2006 PASSED ON I.A.NO.8 IN EX.NC).'7<$»/O2 cm
may T.1:*iv:,E; .. 0.? "THE PRL. DIST. JUDGE AND MEMBER, EAT,
i1*t;'1s.z;<;1;R;...,mswixsslme I.A.NC3.8 FILES BY THE PETITIONERS
H'-P}RVEIN U'[_S'L47 R/W SEC. 151 OF CPO TO HOLD THE
E2X'ECU»iTIC-EN PETITIQN AS NOT MAINTAINABLE.
.'F'E*i¢1?3SE PEFITIQNS COMING ON FOR HEARING: THIS DAY,
A 5} comm MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
question of actionable negligence as well as On
the question of actionable negligence, the has
recorded 3 fmding that the accident has “_
rash and negligent driving of the:=,jrehiele
far as quantum, having regaiwj tol’t.’1_e” age:
and the income, the u a ‘sum of Rs.
1,8€},O()O/- with iI1te:ee,{:”at wlth a further
direction that the from ‘the driver
as well as the jl.eg£ijl’l:represefitatrsres ‘sf owner.
4». me race Misc. No. 13/2002
seeking Set ‘parte award on the ground that
she was 1.1otu.r1ev’::ifieii. llneidentally the said petifion was filed
Rl1§1¢ll13 read with section 151 of C.P.C.
ef the proceedings, the widow of the
_ ewreer (i1ier.i- the legal representatives were brought on
H H K some of the legal heirs are petiiioners and some
are arrayed as respondents. The learned Member of
VT Tribunal having regard to the material on record
A. fieclined to entertain the petitien under Greer 9 Rule 13 and
‘J
:’z i
”
&”w-9.
ll
contractual obligation can the part of the
to satisfy the award. He further submits
have not taken steps to he
Hence he submite that
on the date of the accident, satiefy
the award’ _ ._ ,
7. Mr. appearing for
respon§ieifit–4u the doubt true that the
policy 3-has __dateWof the accident, but however
he submiitsi Vieontiact was between the owner
the company. He having died the
eentfeetuai obligation came to an end and
the fact that the premium was paid by the
-V ‘the policy can net be revived. Another aitemate
V’ V’ ..suiti-fiiieéion made by him is that ixistead of remitting the
‘ itiijitter to the Triburzal for fresh adjudication, respondent-4
u Hii1su1’ence company would satisfy the award amount as a
special case. But, however, interest Compenent is required
to be borne by the owner of the vehicle.
8. Mr. L.S. Clfikkanagouda, ioarneci counsei
for the c1ai:I:na:t1ts submits that the 4.
litigating since last 11 years to g:~:”;¥:”‘the:« jfL1i*.t§1@¢
submits that instead of J
for fiesh adjudication mofe
time, ‘the owner of thee fl1fo”‘p~a3’/9% the interest:
component.
submiission of ‘E31-:::_vIear11o”dV…co1::1se1 for the parties.
10.. the ciaimants as well as the owner of
V’the:i:~e._’, Badraiah Shetty are to be biamed for the
“sifi*{:atioI:a§’_”_’»-T1§:e’ .c1aima31ts when they laid the clam’ petition
g oz}éI1§toé h2;§re impieaded the insurance company as a garty
” t’o’*t_Iu1e f)roceedi11gs. That has not men done. Indeed the
‘iixjzoxiired _mate.ria}s are with the concemed authorities,
Hiamelyr, the invesizigating agency or the Motor Vehicle
iI)opa1’tment indicating as to with whom the vehicle is
ixzsured. The claimants have not taken any steps to I,
If
(ii) the petitioners shall deposit a
60,990/~– towards ixiterest component _
eight weeks from today;
(:11) The direction issued by demsit
and appertionmemt as ixrterest
component is it shall be
released _ 2
of accordingly.
Sdfa;
Tvdgé