High Court Kerala High Court

P.V. Divakaran (Rtd. Peon) vs Secretary To Government on 4 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
P.V. Divakaran (Rtd. Peon) vs Secretary To Government on 4 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 23284 of 2008(V)


1. P.V. DIVAKARAN (RTD. PEON),
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER,

3. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL,

4. SUB TREASURY OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR (PANAMPALLI NAGAR)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

 Dated :04/08/2008

 O R D E R
                                    K.M.JOSEPH, J.
                         - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                             WP.(C) No.23284 of 2008
                         - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                       Dated this the 4th day of August, 2008

                                       JUDGMENT

The only prayer pressed by the learned counsel for the

petitioner is for a direction to consider and take a decision on Ext.P3

representation. Petitioner points out that in the light of Exts.P4 and P5 there

can be no ground for withholding the amount due to the petitioner. Ext.P4

is a communication from the Kerala State Handloom Development

Corporation, which is produced to show that the petitioner is not having

liability in the particular showroom. Ext.P5 is a communication from the

Principal Munsiff intimating that the salary attachment in O.S. 846 of 1998

against the petitioner had been lifted.

2. I heard learned Government Pleader also.

In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing

the second respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P3 in

accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the

petitioner and any other affected party including the plaintiff in O.S. 846 of

1998, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment. In order to facilitate affording an opportunity of hearing, the

petitioner will make available copy of the plaint in O.S. 846 of 1998 along

WPC.23284/2008. 2

with a copy of this judgment. The amount found payable will be disbursed

to the petitioner without any delay, at any rate within six weeks from the

date of taking a decision, by which the amount can be disbursed.

(K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE)

sb