Karnataka High Court
Pushpa Manikya Education Society vs State Of Karnataka on 8 September, 2008
IN THE HIGH Comm' 0? KARNATAKA AT BANQg§Lo'§'g-.: *'
DATED 'THIS THE 373 DAY CF SEPTEMBER _ "
BEFORE
THE HOPPBLE MR.JUSTIC'E.__S. ABQUI. :2
WRIT PETITION NO. 125241 2907 '('I'::z),ur:~*1'
BETWEEN :
PUSHPA MANIKYA E1:>zJCA'1f1éN V'
NQ827. 18? FL0Q~R*««.._V_'-- _
1413 MAIN, 3Rn4.:=;:,,<3<:i;:<: ~. «
RAJAJINAGARS
BANGALORE-IQ.
BY ITS SEC}?-E'T$R'Y
SMT. V. V.EJAYALI'sKSHNH .
W/O. VIJAYAKUB-EAR' '
AGED SSYEARS ' ' "
NQ827, 1sr1='L:7o%;:»i _
Mm MAIN, 32» BLOCK.'
RAJAJIISEACEAR
&A,2*AN<2I¥xIit3f%JP3k%~ 560 016' %%%%% ~ «
'*{__B1isz2;;T S._v BASA:§Lf;%..RAJ, ADV.)
= AND':U._ V
.44: V. STATE :01? KARNATAKA
' .. BY ITS SECRETARY
'~ D'EPARTMEN'1' 02? EDUCATION
* --M...S.BUILDING
VIDHANA VEEDHI
H BANGALOREO1
V" . THE COMMISSIONER 'oz?
PUBLIC INSFRUCTEON
PETITICNER
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE-01
3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR'
OF' PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
SOUTH DfSTRICT
KALASIPALYA " , "
BANGALORE _ 'RESPQN'DENTS"; *
(BY SR1: B. MANOHAR', AGA.)
THIS WRIT PETI'I'IOE*i_I§.3 FILES; UNQER 'ARWCLES 226 OF'
THE CONSTYTUTION OF INDIA; :.,PR.£~\YI_NGVA'*TO'. QUASH THE
GOVERNMENT ORDER I}T.H_29.4_.94_ TRU§}'vVCO!?¥"'OF WI-EECH IS
PRODUCED AND f~;i£1RKED'AzkS'AI*§E€E§§1}RE F. '
'THIS v'.fR1';_3.";PE*£':5:*Joréf*Vl;:c$1\r3:1§&GHQN' FOR HEARING THIS
DAY, THE__QQURT"M.«.'»§DE mL1,Qw;z~:<3;
oflmg
In this 'tbs? has called in qucsiion the
vV.F\}<3jrcrn.1_rrE-at: {1€lt8d....29.04. 1994 (Anncxurc-F) faying
policy to be followed by the primary and
'- A V. M
high schnols inI'_thc}= State of Karnataka gygthtz endorsement
cit, 23.07;. Annt:xt1re~;K Whemby fl1f:appfiCa1ZiOI1 filed
thé pegifiéificr for starting an English Medium School has
3 having regard to the aforesaid language
\».
\--
2. I have hcard lcamed Counsel for the ' V'
3. A Full Bench of '
Managements of Primary Seéagidary 1.1} V
Kmnataka Vs. The State of fig
Department 01' Educmfien Hf.'tAf.l..i.:_ in ILR
zoos KAR 2895 has sufi§i§fk£hui_§fi"§;§¢1iflg clauses in
the aforesaid challenge to
the afomsaiéi: not survive for
considcxaziigjzz; to the petitioner
to makgga: fish grant of permission to
start Engfigh-. for the academic year 2009-
20I{_3r;5g s}1ch"ém...__a_pplication is filed, the respondent
a1;fi:1:11’itj,r_ is to consider the same in accozfiance
V ” costs-,_
v{n:.<1{ light of the aforesaid dccisimn.
" -$1 Iicgooxdingly, writ petition is disposed of. No
Sd/-
Judge
A. (33