High Court Kerala High Court

K.M. Rajasekhara Pillai vs State Of Kerala on 6 June, 2008

Kerala High Court
K.M. Rajasekhara Pillai vs State Of Kerala on 6 June, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 3654 of 2008()


1. K.M. RAJASEKHARA PILLAI,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.MOHANLAL

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :06/06/2008

 O R D E R
                                    K. HEMA, J.
                 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                              B.A.No. 3654 of 2008
                 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                    Dated this the 6th day of June, 2008

                                       O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail

2. The alleged offences are under sections 409, 468 and 471 IPC.

Petitioner who is a Police Constable working in the police station. During

the relevant period he was the Station Writer. He allegedly forged certain

documents, such as passport verification report submitted to the

Superintendent of Police forging signature of the Sub Inspector of Police

and he was suspended.

3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Sub

Inspector who is office bearer of the Police Association has falsely foisted a

case, based on which the crime is registered. According to the petitioner, the

Sub Inspector wanted to evade punishment in respect of certain complaints

made by certain persons to the Superintendent of Police alleging that he was

taking bribe for the purpose of giving passport verification report.

4. This application is opposed. The contentions raised by the

petitioner are not substantiated. There is only bare assertions made by the

learned counsel for the petitioner. On considering the nature of the offence

BA3654/08 -2-

and the manner in which the offence is committed, I am not inclined to

grant anticipatory bail.

The application is dismissed.

K. HEMA,
JUDGE.

mn.