High Court Patna High Court - Orders

B.K.Jha vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 17 August, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
B.K.Jha vs State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 17 August, 2010
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Cr.Misc. No.17571 of 2001

                     B.K.JHA, Son of Late S.Jha, resident of 324, Shivir, First Main
                     Road, 1st Block , Koramangla, Banglore-560034
                                           Versus

                  1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
                  2. Ravi Shankar Singh, Son of Late Ajit Kumar Singh, resident of
                     Bihta Kothi, Mithapur, P.S. Jakkanpur, District-Patna
                                            with
                                  Cr.Misc. No.18518 of 2001

                     B.K.JHA, Son of Late S.Jha, resident of 324, Shivir, First Main
                     Road, 1st Block , Koramangla, Banglore-560034

                                            Versus

                  1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
                  2. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Son of Late Ajit Kumar Singh, resident of
                     Bihta Kothi, Mithapur, P.S. Jakkanpur, District-Patna

                                            with
                                      Cr.Misc. No.18519 of 2001

                     B.K.JHA, Son of Late S.Jha, resident of 324, Shivir, First Main
                     Road, 1st Block , Koramangla, Banglore-560034

                                            Versus

                  1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
                  2. Ravi Shankar Singh, Son of Late Ajit Kumar Singh, resident of
                     Bihta Kothi, Mithapur, P.S. Jakkanpur, District-Patna
                                                 -----------

For the petitioner : None.

For the State: 1. Sri Ajay Mishra, A.P.P.

2. Sri Abhimanyu Sharma, A.P.P.

3. Sri P.N.Pandit, A.P.P.

———-

06 17-08-2010 Today again when the aforesaid cases were called out,

none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press this

petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. However, learned

Addl. Public Prosecutors appearing on behalf of the State in all the

three cases are present. On 13.8.2010 also none had appeared on
2

behalf of the petitioner when the cases were called out. However,

the cases were adjourned for the day with an indication that no

further adjournment shall be granted. While adjourning the case, it

was noticed that in this case, interim order of stay was continuing

since 19.09.2002

Accordingly, the aforesaid three petitions stand

rejected due to non prosecution.

In view of rejection of this petition, interim order of

stay stands automatically vacated.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below forthwith.

NKS/-                                             ( Rakesh Kumar, J )