' AGED 11.301?!' $'?
{N THE HIGH coum' 012' KKRNATMEA; Q * I
DATED THIS-THE. 0187 DAY 05-?
BEFORE " 1
THE HON'-BLE MR.
BETWEEN: V _
'I'I-IIPPAIAH s/o H{J8_SA1E§l Ll';P£§V.::
R/AT no.1-9.79,~%.AzaI::TLNA¢ARV,% C
5'11'?!-on Rr.;-.4«.r.2.;r<=9.:cm_.a.g=; r
{BY 3. .-K 9; 'SH' V? . gs'-E .SI*%E1'§_'.';'--95 " % '
ms s:13*iw.&%;§'§€ A.'D_E"A$'S'I'S,'ADVb._) %
AND'
f MATE ore %
u : REP. 33* rrs REcus'rRAR ¢A;DMu:|- 7
~ mp; :35: rrs CHIJEF-smcnmx-R¥T'* . ,
1.'!',l"E;'}.!'lA1.LI.l"_¢'-lax! I"\l-'IA '
vi' zsuumm,
Ah .
2 was HONBLE LO-l{iAYUI€'FPl£--R xARrm'rAxm~~ %
-i»i_;.S3;BiiiLD'iivit":i.:~W£Tii!_siat'JiTEl"J'ri- T % %
... 'RE8PONDE|':|'I'8--
...(§Y' are: H M-:MANdUNA'I'H'. men FOR R1 &'2-
'SR1 GOUTHAM DEV c.ULLAL._ £&Dv- 1:-or¢*Rny.'T* "
I' 'P""""
ms wnrr PE'I'I'i'lON 10 011.00 UNDER Annexes 50:00.' ' n
227 05* THE. 09 mam PR.AY!-!!Q..'!'Q'QU3:$H.
REPORT UP. 19.5.2003 av ms Aonmomu. REGlS°i'RjvAR"Q§?_R'2_V 0 A A
;-
v u-- v unsw-
VIBE A!*!'!il-.A .!*l-D 1"'-'|'f'
Milo
' nan ' an ur'|.rI.rIvI...pI\aIn ._
nun Fuulnruua an vIJ'C-o*'il\a'iJ-l.¢.$'Iil.l.lC_I'"'-'-n'.i'|=5_Il Elias' -Iulfluli
if
is _i1Ilp1l§l:Ict'3: The pantie' ner
has nine mport dam 13.03.2003
which at 'Ann an' Vin" petiflon.
AA ..... sfi _ _ %
f _ for the.-_ _nct1floncr' _. fii Goutham Dev
(}§E,lfinI. nnnnnnl nu-nu-Inrina liar nnnrunndnnt Mn F) and
L
I-n---.-cl ('1.---_.--..--...-...d. A
x a..: u an im......:.......a.1.. ..:......_.......... ........-......:__... _
an um.-;.mauu_|uunI.u, nacuuuu uuvw.-unwui. nuvuuuw uppcullug
Respondent i~I'o.i. Having heard the
1
3}
THIS? PET TION comic; on F0}: _ H03ARtN:G’..TH0is
hC–1 J
III. ‘
nnpuan A. 1_a_. Annex”
3. ‘Though aevemi contentions have been *
learned counsel for the the sheet’ ” ” V’
mac’ 3 for in this
Ieportdated 19.05.2003whic1:1’ia._.iInp2ugnedV: 7 ‘A’.
On this aspect of the reader, by
petitioner is that the could not have
w……..-“t:ete..-‘ at U’fiii uuuay’ “””‘uxI:naa”””‘
in w.P.No.0105;20j0r.:S, oftm 05.09.2007
and «.t;cm_ would be invalid. As such.
there; is no ” fair’ this to advert to the detmh ofthe
the report dated 19.05.2003 ia
m’A’i.enme-.:e*-…~’-.3-..-:2.-.%e-..-‘.d*’…-ea.-m-.eis
5
vtIf’qttt~;’t~..=t.-3.-t. s;.-.c..–.- the fi”lIP’i3fi.I-ll.”‘a’} 6i’t’;e’f dated 10.05.2tas is
‘ heid to he not sustainable, other grounds
e Winsofar as questioning the enquiry repott dated 13.03.2000
at’ ‘;5″”””
atflnnexure ‘B’ to the petition is premature _at
I do not find it necessary to get ” ”
question the same only aflnr V ‘ % >
a flesh older in View of the dam J1a=V;o5:.2oeoa being
to the I-legible U9 the .-.-1.1.-.3: e!
the petition stands.
_