Karnataka High Court
The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Sri Ellappa Chandran on 31 July, 2009
IN mm mm»: COURT or KARNATAKA AT smegma
l)A'I'ED THIS THE 315'!' mar 01? JULY,
rnasmrr " 'A
THE Horrnm MR.JUS'l'!CE D V snvmmxiaa
A119 % fTf \ 1: « _ Q 1' "
THE HOFPBLE MR.JUB'I"I;{3E ,
Income Taxfii'-meal . «. VV
Between: A"
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF 11~:c:_6M_E"=::_ax .'
C.R,BUiLDiNG, QUE§1E~E'~§S ROAD j' V
BANGALORE '
2 THE1Nc0ME;_TA.X QAFFICERV V "
WARD - 159,1'. C': R E3UiL£)_iN€}, '
QUEENS 390523' . A _' *
APPELLANFS
V .... '(E-I'§»'.__SR§«..MVSESHAGHALA,ADV,85
' 1';sR1'.*»3;'vARAv:ND,Abv.,}
SR1 VVELLAPPA CHANDRAN
NO.4fJ9., Sim c2033' 4 ~~
; ':23: LAYG.Ej'I','J P NAGAR
?§r_H' :=HAsE,"£3A_1~§(3.aL.oRE RESPONIDENT
_ {SR1 K MEALL.AHARA.O,ADV., FOR
» SR}. 3 PARTHASARA'£'§~iI,A£)V.,]
THIS :A?}5EAL IS m.E::> UNDER sac. 260-A OF' E.'I'.AC'F, 1961
ARIS--INGf om' mp' 012932 DATED 31-a5--2o-3*?' PASSED m m NO.
278/BN{};{20Q'?, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-O5, PRAYING TO
V' E'QRM"U'L.i¥}'E THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESFIONS OF LAW S'I'A'I'E{}
~'I'HER;EIN, ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE OREER PASSED
' T ' -_E$V"1'--._T}i'E ETA'? BANGALORE IN ETA NO. 278/ENG/200?, DATED 31-05»
'-- EGG? CONFIRM THE ORDERS GP' THE APPELLATE GOMMISSIOPJER
C{}NF'iRMENG THE ORDER' PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFTCER,
"WARD -- 15{I§, BANGALGRE, IN THE ENFEREST OP' JUSTECE AND
K.ML¥UW" U?' fifl.fiWfi."W«.%fio Héfiw @fl5iW"'-@.2I"'*' mmflmw. WEQW €03}??? WW KARNfl'?A§€& Hififi flfiififi? $33 %%fiNA"fAKA Wfifi mum QF KfihM'\%.&?&W% fifififi QQMR
EQUITY AND E'I'C.,.
lzwww KW %&.W*vE%"fi"fi.l€9% WWW fififim'-'W? fifififl-'«lAW§"&%& Méfifi fifliéfi'? WW fiAl%E%fi.7€&%fil Mfllwfi flmfifiy Q? KAm«l&TMm. WQH CQREQY W M&%M%?A§% Wfiimfi QQMR
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, [3 V
SHYLENDRA l{UMAi32.J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri. M V Seshachala, learned
— revenue has filed a memo seeI§iI3.g:’m«:’iinisSi{2_Ii1’*£0.,V:i&?i§;hiira¢az_
the appeal in the wake of 31¢. réliezlue
law as declared by Bombéljk easel’ of
‘comfisszoma KOODATHIL
KALLYATAN lllin [2009] 309 rm
2. for the respondent
has n0vv”‘0b’jectix>iVl of the appeal.
_ 3. V, appeal is aismimed as withdrawn.
sd/s
J M1976
Sd/5
Ju&g’?”§’