South India Cell For Huma Rights … vs State Of Karnataka on 3 July, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
oATEo THIS THE 3" DAY OF JULY 2009

PRESENT

THE HoI\:'BI.E MR. P.D. DINAKARAN, CHIEF J1t.séTIC'E*;---i 

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V,G.::"SAEBH%3¥I'1'f'   I

wan PE_T___ITzoN No.127731\2oo'g1GM~»RwESaP:TC; .1

BETWEEN:

E South India Cen for Human Raghté..E." E'

Education and Monitoring.  '
Anjanappa Compiex, ,  ' 1

35, Hennur Main Road, 51"'
Lingarajapuram, , '    .
St. Thomas Town P.Q.,'-.. 1, '   '
Bangalore. """    "*::. "

QETIT LONER

(By Sri. Ashok :F!_ara4'nah:aVl'iI."';.,:A'd.IIVoCa't§I General for Apptt.)

AND

1. $t_aIé' ofV.§<arfi'a'ta:ka,._
Depa:*-tment of :4,omjE,x ' --

._ Vidhana*- Sou dha, 

 'B.an'gaioré.. 

2:';-Mér; Jayanfh-.. éhetty,

I A E D'ep'.I.1"tySuperintehdent of Poiice,
 E'{istr_iCtj_Crimalnvestigation Bureau.

 .._"3'L.'j-RVeTH<af.esh Prasaona,
 . ; Inspector;

 



4. H. Shivaprakash,
Sub~Inspector,
Ullai Police Station.

5. Valentine D'Souza,
Circle Inspector of Panambur. .. RESPONDENTS

(Ev Smt. Niloufar Akbar — Addl. Govt. Adv. for Respts.)

This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 ‘canal”2;’,7fo:ij’tiie

Constitution of India requesting the intervention ofmthis Court to-lool<–»_
into the allegations against the Police_Qff_i_cers_–' and.,.fto"~d_irect_ an

investigation into the whole incident 'a.i.n'd–i,to rec.orrim_"end':,,4a'V'rernedyto
this situation. " 's

This Writ Petition comingup'fo'r:..tuii'th_eri.orders on this day, the
Court delivered the following: _ '

""" fiD'i"riai<'aran C.J.,)
"i'he sent by the South India
Cell for Human Rights EdVVuc_aVtion'«a'~nd Monitoring addressed to the Chief
Just.it:e,_ oi="i~,«,éa..r.nataka, Bangalore, with respect to the

unnatarali.V'deat*h_of'~l\iau_shad Kashirnji, learned counsel practising at

.i:':'ii€.a_ngalo.re, was tal§'e_n.'?bn file as suo motu Public Interest Litigation and

_ a:n..,_i_nterim- order' passed on 29.04.2009 which reads as hereunder:

V §'IF<e_gistr'y is directed to reciassify the writ petition as
public interest litigation and with the State of
,Vu"i<a'rnatal–inspector of Ulla! Police Station,
Sri. Vaientine D’Souza — Circie Inspector of
Panambur figuring as respondents 2 to 5
respectively, emergent notice is ordered to these