V Padmanabhan vs Regional Transport Officer on 25 February, 2010

 

mi-

 

IN THE HIGH COURT 0:' KARNATAKA.  

DATED Tms THE 25TH DAY Q§*_FE3RUA.RY';"'203.u. " = 'V

BEFORE.  X 3 '
THE HON'BLE MR.JUS'fICE RAMiMor1A1~él_REn--3bY%
WRIT PETITION No.V2§V1i§9{)8..aOF 2099 

BETWEEN

V. Padmanabh-am,  _
S/0 Vishwan3.da:';V;'V  ~ ' -
Aged abouei 29,."y::2i:>'s--... ,   _
R/at N0.934, 2-2=iT{Ma1n';V 'V
25m c:oss,--A_HsR L:'1¥;:~;'out..f-
Bangalore --.    -- .' ..PETITIONER

{By Sh. EV.-T_. 4Ravi'r1VsoVr"1 &  
Sri. J. Ananda;v Ad*a{s.}._ ' '

    ..... 

Officer.

” Elechfoxfxiic City,
Bangalore — 560 I00.

2. “S-.¢rV’1ior Inspector of Motor

–. Vehicles.

Electronic City.

Bangalore ~ 560 1.00. HRESPONDENTS

Sri. RB. Venkataramana. GA}

This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227
of the Constjiut’:ion of India praying to quash the Ar1r1eXure–A

@4311;

The petition is accordingiy rejected. it

to state that it is open for the petit§o:1o:s~.V

necessary application in the appealszfo1*2,ret’1’ieVifjg__

documents from the custodyof thé’rsspondé;i{t+.Rcf;g_ioria3,iV

Transport Office.

In.