High Court Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Jeth Mal vs Nand Lal & Ors on 12 August, 2008

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Jeth Mal vs Nand Lal & Ors on 12 August, 2008
         SBCSA NO.74/2007 - JETHMAL V/S NAND LAL AND ORS. : JUDGMENT DATED 12.8.2008


                                            1/2

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

                                          JODHPUR.


      S.B. CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.74/2007

      Jethmal

                                              versus

      Nand Lal and ors.

                                      PRESENT

                  HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI


      Mr.S.P.Sharma, for the appellant.
      Mr.S.C.Maloo, for the respondents.



      DATE OF JUDGMENT                        : 12th August, 2008.

                                         JUDGMENT

1. Heard the learned counsels.

2. This appeal arises out of the judgment of first appellate

Court dated 29.1.2007 affirming the judgment of the learned trial

Court dated 17.7.2006. Both the courts below have granted decree of

eviction in favour of the respondent – plaintiff – landlord on the ground

of material alteration and default.

SBCSA NO.74/2007 – JETHMAL V/S NAND LAL AND ORS. : JUDGMENT DATED 12.8.2008

2/2

3. The learned counsel for the appellant – tenant has

submitted that the land in question was open land with three sides

covered with stone pattis and therefore, placing of sheds and raising of

wall, putting of water tank for opening a Dhaba/restaurant does not

amount to material alteration and therefore, the courts below have

erred in arriving at that finding.

4. The learned counsel for the respondent has urged that

both the Courts below have concurrently arrived at finding of facts that

there was no stipulation in the rent note that the premises in question

are being given with an intention to open a restaurant/dhaba for which

the tenant would be allowed to raise this kind of construction.

5. Having heard the learned counsel, this Court is of the

opinion that the findings of facts arrived at by the learned Court below

about the material alteration are findings of facts based on evidence on

record and no substantial question of law arises for consideration by

this Court. The second appeal is devoid of merit and the same is

accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.

(Dr.VINEET KOTHARI)J.

Item No.46
Ss/-