High Court Kerala High Court

M/S.Thulasi Industries vs State Of Kerala on 7 January, 2008

Kerala High Court
M/S.Thulasi Industries vs State Of Kerala on 7 January, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

OP.No. 3609 of 2003(D)


1. M/S.THULASI INDUSTRIES,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE,

3. THE DIRECTOR,

4. THE GENERAL MANAGER,

5. THE SALES TAX OFFICER, OTTAPALAM.

6. THE DY. TAHSILDAR (R.R.),

                For Petitioner  :SRI.GEORGE JACOB

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :07/01/2008

 O R D E R
                  C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

                  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
                     O.P.No. 3609 of 2003 (D)
                  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

               Dated this the 7th day of January, 2008

                         J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is challenging Ext.P12 order, wherein State

Level Committee confirmed disallowance of Rs.1.17 lakhs out of

sales tax exemption claimed by the petitioner, on the ground that

the same was an investment on building by the old industry,

restarted by the petitioner under different name. It is seen that

sales tax exemption claimed under sick industry rehabilitation

scheme was partly allowed based on auditors report. It is found in

Ext.P2 that the old unit namely Krishna Industries was started in

the year 1968. However, it was closed down on 12/02/1990. Later,

the unit was started by the petitioner in the new name, and

production started on 30/09/1994. The investment made under the

Sick Unit Revival Programme is granted in terms of SRO 227/1987.

Disallowance is only limited to the investment on the building prior

to the coming into force of the scheme. I do not find any ground to

interfere with this part of the order challenged in the O.P. This

O.P is therefore dismissed as devoid of any merits.

C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
Judge
ms