High Court Karnataka High Court

Kendra Upadyaya Sangha vs Smt Khairunnisa on 24 March, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Kendra Upadyaya Sangha vs Smt Khairunnisa on 24 March, 2008
Author: H.G.Ramesh
  " .sR:.1e1uJ,.§i3' P_ASHA
V .4 ""'sm' SYDivAB1

    aim? NOORJAHAN

W.P 51036012008

:14 mm men comer or icsnxxnum gr 
DATED 11-113 mm 241'! nm or amen     "  %
swam  u_ H  %L
was I-Ionrnm ma.     J

 

WRIT mwrzox 30.759 or   °   %

KENDRA UPADYAYA SANGPLA  *  
REGISTERED BY GENERAL«--SECRETARY"~fw  _
No.27/100, DR DVGROAD  T. I»  '
BASAVANAGUEJI V      "
BANGALORE-05_ .__ 3   -;;,,_PE'I'I'I'IONE'.R

(BY SRI K 1*  PR;j\:$D., ma V Q 
M   %%%%   ,  ,   
1 Sm KHAiR1.:1~:1sz1$A  _ _'

w/0 LATE ABDAUL 12593110 _
2 . SR1 Mafiaaooa-~PA-2315"

..=3/"0~I.A*r1: ABDUL RASHID
 ' ..... .. 'V

 SIC)' '3g1'.A;.--3::2uL RASI-III)
-MAJOR; 

 W/QLATE WAHAB SAB
.. , MAJOI2

D/O LATE WAHAB SAB
MAJOR

RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5 ARE
RESIDING AT NO 2



 *  _ S£i_I__'i'*M_AMATA G KUEKARNI, ADV FOR R~9)

 4 UAI)I)L. c1'D;_C:v1L JUDGE, BANGALORE AND QUASH / SET-
_ ."--~.As1DE_ THE ORDER PASSED 0:»: I.A.NO.5 DATED 26.31.07 AT
'  "At§;m::{URE-F.

T  HEARING THIS DAY,'1"HE'. COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

W.P 110.760/2008

151' MA}N, 8'33 CROSS
DEEPANJALINAGAR
BANGALORE -~ 560 026

6 SR] KAREEM PASI-IA
S/O SR1. BASHA SAB
MAJOR

7 SR] AMBER JAI-IN   
S/O LATE WAHAB SAB I
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS

23 SRI IQBAL PASHA _
s/0 LATE SABU  
MAJOR  "

RESPONDENTS6 'I'O_8.ARE  
RESIDEN'I'Sf;)F._KEN;GERI'4iLI..A(3E Z
BANGALORE SQUTH--.TAi.IJi.'5-"K  _ 
BANGALORE -*:.§_o_'_ = *    .

9 SR] KARAR';2fiMED 3  '
s/DDR1. NA KHH5 ' ,
MAJOR, RESID1N{3 AT N-Q so ;
81'3"-MAIN, '2*'9C'ROSS  " _
ROS}-IAIN? COLOIk'Y.=TI£'.AKNA(?uAR

BANGALOIQE -441  " " ...RESPONDEN'I'S

(BY SR3 'S p.sHAN'r;AR','sEr§1oR ADV. FOR
'  'i?E'i'1'I'ION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF'

T}:e:"-T'.§:oN.'~:'1_*r:_13*§jI'DN OF INDIA PRAYiNG TO CALL FOR
RECORDSV~IN C3.$.NO.2369/1996 on THE FILE 0;? THE 14'"!

THIS WRIT PETYPION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY



WP M03760/2008

ORDER

This writ petition by the plajntflf is,

against an interlocutory order u

(Annexure-F) passed by the trial 9-»

the XXVAdditiona1 City Civi1″J1;dge;’-13Vaz1ga}oie;’i_:1Htifie A

suit in O.S.NO.2369/1996. oxheeeimpugmeaoemcr,

the trial Court has orflered. 2510.3 framed

in the suit as a ‘pre__’ ‘ relates to

the L

2. I Gfiiidwa Prasad, learned
counsel “the petitioner and

S1’i.S.I5′.St;an’k.,u¥~r ,” iea’ .1-serlior counsel appearm g for

jN-9.9 the impugned order at

A11iiex1j;°e’-$3.” – . V P

: and no legal infirmity in the impugned order in

‘ of the judgment of a division Bench of this

passed in the connected matters in

;R.F.A.Nos.629 to 633/ 1998 in Immma UPADI-IYAYA

33\*«/

.. 4..

W.PNO.76v0/2008
smena an we. LIBNIYAPPA Arm omms am

2004 mm 575).

Petition dismissed.

KM/Ata