High Court Karnataka High Court

Murthappa vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 26 February, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Murthappa vs The Deputy Commissioner … on 26 February, 2009
Author: Ravi Malimath
Haw:

n wwn-wmn Wm evrxmmvrmarmtum Maw?"  VII" 9!%«l'\fil'fl'*&!l'*'El\l'\ l"iI%34E"H huufli 'Jr Ht.AKNfl§.AE\R          <

IN THE HIGH sonar 0: KAAHATAKA. 3ANsAwaE "'»T.

ammo mrs mm 261'?-I new or FEBRUARY 2".:r..t'1'$  

swans
'P1-{E I-II::;<.;,A». "  
3. 'szfb. 

 I/O £.{A.'PEv~..'1'HI'P£'ANNA, 45 mags,

 raga? C/'av 'if.Ko':'AxDAam,
 ".?_E:AC§-{ER,""0PP T0 sew. uaau SCHOOL,
 ._ Ki3£ahGCéTE, zmmaanuasa mum.

. . RESPONDENTS .

sm. M.c.m:;AsHaa;s, HGGP ms 31 s. 9.2..
931.1%. mmmmau, Anvo-can FOR 33)

THIS am. ammo K315113311 mrrcnss 226 ANI3 22′? :3
THE GGNSTITUTIOR OF INEIA To QUASH ‘I*H’£ éafififi

V1″

wwn

a WW-wmm Wm l\fl’IIEB*l(‘\Ii#”%HVo.#°’» mswn WI?’ Kfiflmfififlflf’ filfifgg Rwy”. V?” Q

Govcrnxrzent Plaader, which saws that tne.. =1:’afm£i:g

haw man said in 3 public: auctiem in _
non–paymant af land revenue. ?ng:afa£é;*i}£i#dpna “‘
arror er illegality in the i@pu§nad&o§d§f, #h§ch

calls for intarrereace. $’v’a__z1 c£’f:§£wiae;,”‘ ap,4_vg.ra§und

is made cut calling for in£$=x1;»fae.3;fent’£ a~.–

7. For tha ab§n}€V:’A’ the petition
is rejected. !~4[;”2v”-:;£33t::iVLV”‘ :t: V V’
Judge

H513