IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.40597 of 2010
GANESH ROY, S/o Opin Roy @ Upendra Roy, R/o Vill.-
Alampur, P.S. - Azam Nagar, Distt.- Katihar
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
3 11.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri
A.M.P. Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
The petitioner, who is in custody in Azam Nagar
P.S. Case No. 108 of 2010, for the offence under Section
302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of
bail.
It was alleged by the informant that the
petitioner was having illicit relation with the wife of the
deceased who was none else but the wife of younger
brother of the husband of the informant. The informant
had alleged that after hearing noise she arrived there and
she has witnessed the petitioner fleeing away. The
informant has made specific allegation against the
petitioner.
In view of the facts and circumstances, I don’t
find any material to extend the privilege of bail to the
petitioner.
Prayer for bail stands rejected.
It was submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioner, that in the case diary, save and except,
2
allegation of illicit relationship, there is nothing on record.
The court is of the opinion that the submission of learned
counsel for the petitioner is exactly contrary to the
allegation made in the F.I.R.
Petition stands rejected.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.)
Praful