High Court Karnataka High Court

Subbarayalu vs Smt Lakshmamma on 22 October, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Subbarayalu vs Smt Lakshmamma on 22 October, 2008
Author: N.Ananda
IR 'HIE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT 

DATED THE 22» mm' or ocronzn  %     

BEFORE

ms: Homsm am. JU8TI(:1':v}1'!\I.;'_3'~§EA41'7~'.~,31&.'.j:".   %A

MISCELLANEOUS rmsr  zed; %4?r:;%1 

BETWEEN:

1. suamxayanu,

S/0 CHELINAGAIAH,

AGED ABOUT so YEARS. :   % 
122/aHULLAHALL1v3LLAC::E,  g  
NANJANGUD TALUK,  ~ ~ ..   V
MYSGRE 1)1s'm1:Ur. _ % %

1111 H %  _ L   APPELLANT
(BY 3:: P.MAHf3SH_A, .3...f.'z{j2i'SfiIiA' as Smt HLNAGARATHNA
zmvocxras)  ._ %     

1. Smfi  '''' "
wig. 1,  Purzgswam,
AGEB 533961? 35" Yi-;A.RS.

 "'£§fi;aHAD£:'1IAS§?i2'£§§1Y 'J
- T ,5/<3, mm 

 - ~ ~ ..§gGEI_Z3 fgB::)U'i'._.i£{_5_ Yams.



MFA 4721/98

3. KUMAR
S/0. LATE PUTTASWAMY,   
AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS. : '

4. PADMA
D] 0. LATE PUTTASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS.

THE RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 ARE...,MINORs  

REPRESENTED BY THEIR GUARD’IAN._MfGT!-ERR _
FIRST RESPONBENT, % . J =
ALL ARE Rm P€AYAKA’S.S’PREE’$»’-,V–v. _ ‘ .%

SANTHE MARAHALLE Ream — &i;:7131;;3,
CHAMARAJANAGAR_TfOWf1?€’8s .{)£S’I[RI(.’.’I’_. ”

5. PALANI@MANI ..

S/o Gov1N3:)AiAH_,”g. .

AGED ABCJUT 40 YL*»;–1Rs,~, _ ~
HULLAHALIA; vI–Lm.GE 5713’14; = %
NANJANGU{)*i’;xLt:K; *
MYSORE DIS’i’Ri£_}1′. _

6. THE DIv1s:I{jNAL MAN-EQER.
I-‘NEW INDIA ;#?sSSU.RANCE”(3{)M~PANY 131).,
a’~.,:,.Ia. ROAD, «::.w_\m_1NDx PURAM,

MY’3_0RE – …R.£3SPON1)I£N’§’S

Appeal filed U/S 30(0) Worlmctfs

_ against the judgment”: dated 31/ 1212007 passed
ii§V”‘Wf37A,’FC[N6.53j2O07 an the file of Labour Omcet and

fur Wormcrfs Compcnaation, Chammnganfiar,

%’ Afgs~a;aingT;a Gompensafion ems. 1,s5,43e;_ with Interest @ 12%. j;

\/1
;

‘§%%§; ‘§’§-3″”

¥$§§

3

3