mwwm war" mammmmmma WWW €..¢.t;)UKE: {;2F.:.: KARNKFAKA Hififi CQURT (BF KARNafi'§'AKJ& fiififl CQURY OF KARNATAKA HIGH CQURV OF ¥€AflNA'§"AE(.& E-§!€3s§~£ COURT
11% 785 HIGH CCWRT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE.
9.4755 ms was 15*" am or asceraasa 5g
8EF'0RE
we H€3i'ai'Bi.E i\'!R.,}USTI{ZE zawaa k
Carmina; mgzgg Pfll'_LI<C)I"i'.t3____:S;';.:;3Lf£*§V13_1,{"3%_. A"?
uuuuu urn-urn
1 RAIN 2:0:-11:. a
sxo vsapmmss KOHZL
AGED AEOUT31
R/AT K'IMSlME'DI_CA§_;CO'i;LE'GE.f=.._ % %
BANGALGRE A
RJAT Nc}."1€i8@E3LFVi.;-1¥'J§C§.?éV
NEW neu%+1j%% L '.
%%%% % + FETITISNER
(3? sm AH %3a,a1:;qSs.§:vjs;k$£§£ gnmaasnaxaxsn MA,A1:::vs.)
ANS
'STfis*fj'E~€vi?;' $<'.fidi1%AT.#sKA av Les<.acru:<mA
%mrs¢:Lr<3
" . 3'? TH§ $Tfi«YE ?U8§.I{I ?ROSECUTOR
'iE*i._IG§t§'Ci3.&JRT BUIWIRGS
B£iRGaki.ORE
" RESPONDENT
* :(E¥k5:-éu 3.A,sEL.:.zA99A &. 5:-:91 MLNAWAZ, sms.)
Ti-IIS mL.&t= IS FILEG £315.39? as/w 491 cam: m
“SET ASIDE THS GRDER £}T.2.8.G? PASSE9 BY THE
S?L.3U%E, fiAP«iGAL£3¥{E uamzsa 3:51,, §Ai\i®’-tLGRE cm
IR SPLECKGI P46. 138/83¢
This Fetitiors naming are for Finai Qispasaé thia day? the
C3§.::°t mafia ths feifiowingz
2,7
..-wmmw. a «mm a *-*-“‘””* wf IKHKNIWAEQA 2-1i€;;%H COURT OF KARNAYAKA HIGH COURT 9? KARNATAKA I-QEGH CQUR? OF K&RNfiLTfl.KA H§G!’£ COL???
iii
resutbeci in filing of chargeshaat against {numbers cf-{ha
vzammitm and studenw who had gainad admiasic§;._;§i{%:.§i;g.hv..V
such irrmularities and mat-practices. The
an-mugs: them. Upon submissian af-iti$’e*~fi.né§i’A
accused have been summaned ‘{z’¢§}§;– _ ?$::e&v_..i fi§ia£
opportunity was gi-van 120 ther5r:’§§”~V.L;rge;V’gr9r.:n§i’$
framing of marge. The §2a:tEtio;;a’r’V:§i;£~;fé’E:x.’whe$« ‘is’~r£*2’r;!m as
firs: accused rasietad fian;Enfiu§ ground that
ever: if the is accepted,
it makes out; punishable under
Sectian 33:5 aisa faabie ta raise
charge rérgna 429 and we of me.
hi this rega§é«,._V%%itvv véa-5;VAL:.r1g’a?i’ that tha pefitwaar was oniy
:x;§fiorv_’:§s§ge§V’1? ya§a5w§t..i;he tam of admission am he Wag
‘a«;imiftedA sahegcry afiaer he depesited the
arr’::¢’uV§”: tV’fi$§e§I”j§§7′ f% and he has an raie ta play in any
‘ ___ a.f*se3_§’mtia$’é’:.. and he is irscapahke no? influencing or
. ..1. f ‘_§§c§;SA;:§c#§;:gvV”cammitm members. Howevar, it is afwgad
damfiozt af aimm erima, his aefmission was
“‘x::§.:?i§a¥Iad in E333 month 0? Nayembat 1993 dapriving the
2-zenefifi af aémisskars and image, the has naming tn dc: with
the aiiegeé ma!-gxraaticas. The State had epposm the
cantersftians St} urged :’esa:£ting in the leameé triai sudge
aw
W*”‘~””W’* * NW’ 1 WWW”: 8~«*.§IE:” mmcmmmm. HIWW CQURY Q? KAENATAKA HIGH CQURT OF mmmmm MEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HiC§vH COUR”
mm: far 15: war M833 course at this tirm of inbarviaw,-.__his
rank was shawn as 1692 whim was secumd by”
individuai by mama R.;G,Reddy (;.w.27. He
there is my allegation that first V’
impersanatad as said student nor
that signature on filiad up &V[3§[{:|g«Vs’.¥_f>.’§0f3A.V.v’1%fi£i–.fi’$r3dé: ViVfl” {ha
name sf C.W.27. Thu; gjso’ f$¥$fi£S first
petitioner has mart seiectien
aemmittee and with the
inbentian of any of member
éuring ” Eéévgrai either grounds are
urged ea figek ~ ‘
5. Shri fieéliappafl §aa_xfz’é'<i§ fif§:;Js'§seji.'V¥:§§ t§1e respaneierxb
Lakayuktha i:fiA.r;fiwga1:Vi§i:é§'§:v:f the ground urged
m swk:_dischar:gaJ impugned ardar and
pcinm simiiar circazmstances Ea
_cr5.%%w:.p.%:~ao; céafiecm with cr1.m=.No.1wa;2ovas
«..E§jecbefi suzxh cmtentiens and has
':¢'%§§gr%af 31¢ triaf Ceurt framing charge. A
:apyVV:é?..;d**é $a«r§ie $5 made avai£ab£e. It is evident frarn the
arder dafid "19'8.2m9 awed $1'; the abava said cw: that a
gm simim' w tha yiea urged in mis patitior: was
Wmm W mmmmm amm mmm W» s%;ARNA%'I'A2m. a-mm {mum «W mxmumam Haw mmzm M mmmmm mm; mam M mmmam mew Gown'
canvassed. This ccmrt had examined the issue cm the: mint
as be whether the lriai Caurt has assigned sufficient .2;-*ééécr:1 a:._
ta rejeat tha request against Framing bf charge.
noticing the ahservatiama :3!' time: Apex: éiaasxrt '
2081 sc 150}'(5mt.Dmwati and mengevs. $i::.a_viEie2.:"f:i's.E':3v{¥{tg.ijfV§':v~:.
Eielhi Administration and otha?s–§:vL:"'?a_e»Id ittét
was not required to aasjgn §ie§§{§§;«::3"–»..gfaa%dns-_.mi frama
charge. This Court niso giacvad by tha
pr-asecaztion was 'V " # primavfacie
case for char5gaa§"»vf;;;VrA::.:_;:t§§fa"iéfffifiwge under Sectian
12:')-B, 429.ar}§'~§$§1::9f_ the said petftions,
3 am satfifiad tjtiexceptiosz and patitionsrfi
stand is virti:a13]§a.,s$fi':§é'af;sw§§£as urged by ether ca-accused.
go s'ui¢i:–w§v§s__i$_{:«w go in dstaif as be whether the
A"§.'_:;f§;§$V:V"s2,}%;t15':t'.'fA§_f'sf«.:*§sa_ns suppart uitirmbe £t£¥2'££iEiJ$EGi'¥ arsé 5!:
V suL";fi";z§ *–t1cr triai Court'; concfusian that prima-
T 'ficia fiéfide eat for framing the marge is based are
" E : u'ééf?§*ii§r£a§pviécad bafere it by 'him prasacution arid cannot be
'éfiiithg aesidw this, it §§ 233 be natimd that in tha
' Qffiiiéar circumstances, severe? other at/udenhs are arraigned
ulané am pefitixoner stems at par with mam and tim case
éairzg simiiar in nature, rmazéres 23¢ interference with the
F3
irrspzggneé aréer.
w%Nw3°W.i WY” nxnnmmsmwa wmlemm €-.a§:p?’aa33″: %4’&_’: KAQQNIMAKA &-HG?-i QQURT OF KARNfi9a”§’&K£«’b. HEGH C033? 0? E{ARN&TAKA HEGH COURT Oi” KflhRNA’¥”fit?(fia 3′-ZSQEH CQURT
As far as the conwntion of the gati::ionaer’s Cvungei
that mm is m: materiat be wtablish change under
4&8 at 128-B or any other offence is cangzerned, ?$v ”
he urge aii these zzcmtanticns before vt§°;e-trial v§_Ir’:,:e ‘
abservatians made herein ahcwe sha’l’%4.vn&i:T£:’::niez~.–
of trial Caurt deciding the can V’ ‘ 1 V-