S Shankaranarayana Bhatt Since … vs Mrs Fathimunnisa Begum on 15 October, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE

DATED THIS T HE 15?" DAY OF OCTOBER A'

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR.JUsT_1c.E§H.EiL':".A" 15  

RFANO. 67 oi%f2G0:3A1'

BETWEEN:

s. SHANKARANARAYANA BHATTD  . A ' _
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRsV_---~ _  '

1.

SMT. KAVERAMMA,   .
w/0 LATE S.SHANKARAN

;AY.ANA..Er:A:!_*_r.)---
AGED ABOUT--~75  "  1 

sMT.EHAG:RA'1*}g:1,.V . __ 1. V
",,YANA,.BHAT'1',

1:)/0 LATE  ,s1AIA'[:;KA1§Aj\1'A
AGED A130'm=j_ 50  ._

SM_T.PAD V A '''x:A1'I#§I, ' '   '  ._ -
13/ Q s.SHANK;ARANARAyANA BHATT,
AGEI)._AB.OUAT 

.SM'1'.MAf.ATHI; 

~ /0* s.sHANiLARANARAYANA BHATT,

"  AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

. pi u

_ " sMT,;YAiviIEJVN"AVATH1,
._ -  D/'0 sv.sI~:ANKARA:\zARAYANA.
A ' AGED'A'18_rjUT44 YEARS,

"SM;T...BI;{ARATHI,

D / "S. SHANKARANARAYANA,

A' ' AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

' "éR1.sREs:1VAs BEAT,

S/O SSHANKARNARAYANA,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.

L//A



ALL ARE C / O LAKSHMI BHAVAN.
HOTEL/LAKSHMI RESTAURANT
NO. 109, ST. JOHN' CHURCH
ROAD, FRAZER "DOWN.

BANGALORE -- 560 005.   "

(By Sri OHANDAN S RAO & K. sURYANA1:eAYA1s,tA"t§AO'; ADVSJ   V'

AND:

MRS. FATHIMUNNISA BEGUM; 

W/O MRJABBAR BAIG, 

AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. 

R/O No.46. MILLER'S ROAD. 

2ND CROSS, BENSON  5    

BANGALOREW 560046. * 'A  '--  1 f  ._.RESPONDENT

{By Sri K.K.VASANTH. AD'\I';}- If V
 "E3/_s'._9'ej OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT_ AND DEC1~'{E_E3._  34.12.2008 PASSED IN
O.S.NQ-.15983,/2OU3.AOfJ. TI.-_IE1 FILE..OF THE XXVI ADDL. CITY
c1V1LVJUDGE;1\AAYQ 1-IALL._' BANGALORE PARTLY DECREEING
THE sU1*:'EORw.'sEcAOVERY--. OF POSSESSION ARREARS OF
RENT AND -MESNEV IéRO';'et1fA1s, 
TEIS~..RFA cOM_'IN'sK' FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COfJR'f_DELIV"ERED THE FOLLOWING-
J U D G M E N T

Eedrtied counsel for the respondent has filed

a’i’1::er:.1O dzited 15.10.2009. which reads as under:

if;-“1i1(3 appellants herein handed Over the
possession of the Schedule property On

12.4.2009, agreeing to pay mesne profit of

L/

Rs.2,00,{)O0/~ in twenty installment at’;..___
Rs.10,{)0O/~ per month; and issued

Cheques duiy drawn by Srinivas

Appellant No.7, commencing from %

2009, and out of them :fiVe”cheqAues’

already hongtéred. As such the

be dismissed.

2. In View of this, Af.heA°appea1 is “dis-,m.i»ssed. as

it does not survive fof’ Ce’ns’ic1%é»1j:1ti6n”_.AA,VA _

Sd/-

JUDGE