High Court Madras High Court

A. Alexander Dalt vs 4 Joint Commissioner Of Police on 16 February, 2010

Madras High Court
A. Alexander Dalt vs 4 Joint Commissioner Of Police on 16 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.02.2010

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R. SUDHAKAR

W.P.No.  33811 of 2006

1    A. ALEXANDER DALT                    ..		     PETITIONER 

        Vs

1    STATE OF TAMILNADU                           
     REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
     HOME DEPARTMENT,  CHENNAI 600 009.

2    DIRECTOR  GENERAL OF  POLICE
     CHENNAI 600 004

3    ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR  GENERAL
     OF POICE & COMMISSIONER OF  POLICE,
     MADRAS CITY,  CHENNAI - 600 08.

4    JOINT  COMMISSIONER OF  POLICE
     (LAW AND ORDER),
     MADRAS CITY POLICE,
    CHENNAI - 600 008. 		       .. 		RESPONDENTS

   Prayer

	Original Application No. 9649 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench to issue a direction to call for the records (1) C.R.No. 19 /95/PR 2(2) /DPI Dist  dt. 22.8.1995 of the  4th respondent (2) Pro Appeal No. 9/PR II (2)/ 96 dt. 20.5.1996 of the   3rd respondent and (3) Pro. RC No 19554 /AP.2 (2) /98 dt. 26.6.1998 of the 2nd respondent, quash the said orders dt. 22.8.1995, 20.5.1996 and 26.06.1998 of  Respondents 4, 3 and 2 respectively. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was transferred and numbered as Writ petition.   

		For Petitioner		..	Mr. M. Ravi

		For Respondents		..	Mr. S. Sivashanmugam,
						        Government Advocate


ORDER

The petitioner challenges the proceedings imposing punishment of stoppage of increment for 2 years with cumulative effect in this writ petition.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the appeal and the review filed by the petitioner before the Government were dismissed. There after the petitioner had preferred a mercy petition before the Government and that the same is pending with the Government. He would submit that a direction may be issued to the Government to dispose of the mercy petition.

3. Heard. Mr.S. Sivashanmugam, counsel for the respondent. In view of the limited prayer sought for, the respondent Government is directed to dispose of the petition dated 21.10.1998 on merits. The petitioner is entitled to make further representation along with the copy of the earlier petition made to the first respondent and same

shall be considered and disposed of within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition stands disposed of. No cost.












sms

To

1    STATE OF TAMILNADU                           
     REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
     HOME DEPARTMENT,  CHENNAI 600 009.

2    DIRECTOR  GENERAL OF  POLICE
     CHENNAI 600 004

3    ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR  GENERAL
     OF POICE & COMMISSIONER OF  POLICE,
     MADRAS CITY,  CHENNAI - 600 08.

4    JOINT  COMMISSIONER OF  POLICE
     (LAW AND ORDER),
     MADRAS CITY POLICE,
     CHENNAI 600 008