IN THE HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 27% DAY OF AUGUST 2010 BEFORE THE I-iON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MORAN REDD_..\.€._"" WRIT RETITION NO.435 OF 2010 (SRESI ,BOE1'f:/lLEE_l\i;. SR1 S.?ETITIO.NER' --. (av M/S: SUBBAR._AO.& CO;"A'OvO:C.A_TES=;.V_ 1 ~ > 2 HMT MA'CHII_\|E TOO.LS._ LTD I. HMT 8HA'\_/AN,' NO._59;.f«.. BELLARY ROAD _ 8ANGALORE'e._45Co 032 " R. REPRESENTED 'BY ITS. CHA'IRM'A AND' 4r»;(:ANG.AING DIRECTOR. 'THE DDEPLIW GENERAL MANAGER HMT .MACHI'NE..TOQLS LTD. 'L.__BAVNGATLQ"R-E COMPLEEX I~IMT,FfiOST'« ' BANGALORE 2- SS0 013. ...RESPONDENTS
A (BY SORE; IOSHUA H SAMUEL, ADVOCATE FOR
A M/S:-CARIAPPA & CO, ADVOCATES)
V”THIS.””;«.AIRIT PETITION IS IRILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF TH§
_f«C_AS’E INCLUDING RERTAING T_O THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER AND TO
M
QUASH THE SUPERANNUATION NOTICES DATED 8.102009 ISSUED BY
RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE–A AS THE SAME IS VIOLATIVE OF
ARTICLE 14, 16 AND 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ANDST-O
DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO REINSTATE THE PETITIONER “TO.
POST FROM WHICH HE IS RELIEVED PURSUANT TO ANNEXURE~A ‘IN/I’I”*.H”;’\_
FURTHER DIRECTION TO PAY HIM ARREARS OF WAGES ‘,_ I
THE CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERs’I’EEE:O.RE’~~.THE
COURT THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE EOL..:Ow’INs;–
0 R D E R
Taking on record the memo’, ‘tI:I’€L.petEI:V’iO{I Es.VAé’ccO~–r:di’n’giIy
dismissed as withdrawn.
TYPO gadg3
KM