High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Mangal Dome vs The State Of Bihar on 13 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Mangal Dome vs The State Of Bihar on 13 September, 2011
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr. Misc. No.30026 of 2011
          Mangal Dome son of Late Basant Dome of Amarpur Paijaba (Ranipur), P.S.-
          Mehdiganj, District- Patna                                ...Petitioner
                                        Versus
        The State Of Bihar                                               ...OP
                                       -----------

2/ 13.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is behind the

bars only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused

and there is no other case of similar nature pending against him.

This fact shall be verified by the Magistrate before releasing the

petitioner on bail.

Considering the aforesaid, let the petitioner, above

named, be released on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of

Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction

of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, in

connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No.203 of 2011, subject to the

conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he

is related with the petitioner and another bailor shall be the mother

of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to

the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That

the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court

concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar

nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court
2

below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of

bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date

and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on

two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) That the

petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do

so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

In view of the nature of case, the petitioner is

directed to report to Mr. Kishore Kunal, Chairman, Bihar Religious

Trust Board, Bihar, Patna, within fifteen days of his release on

provisional bail for a period of six months and file a certificate

about the same in the court within the stipulated time. In case, the

petitioner fails to file certificate, notice shall be sent to him for

cancellation of bail, (ii) That once the petitioner reports to Mr.

Kunal, Mr. Kunal is requested to evolve a method by which without

affecting the petitioner’s present vocation, if any, the petitioner can

be made socially productive so that an effort is made to bring him

back in the main stream of the society and (iii) At the end of the six

months, the petitioner will be required to file a certificate in the

court below granted by Mr. Kishore Kunal. If the certificate granted

to the petitioner is found satisfactory, the court below will confirm

the provisional bail granted to the petitioner or else will issue notice

for cancellation of bail.

JA/-                                            (Anjana Prakash,J.)