Shashi Rekha vs D Manjunath on 18 August, 2009

.. 1 -
IN THE HIGH comm' 012' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY 9}?' AUGUST _
BEFORE   V' '_ 
THE HCWBLE MRJUSTICE »s..N4.sAffi?A':A  . " V 
AGEL45 YRS, Ri10.3R;3 c:;R}:Jss,3j ~  = 

PARVATHI NAGAR,-1 V
I3ELLARY_   . 

  V _   ~ _  APPELLANT
(By SR1: 'Ev PATEL, AQWABSENT

£513 _

"  MANJUNHI'I<f

  -- ::"§h;iFx!%L1I{.4kf2JUNA

"  ,nA{..L}aMA PRABHU

V 2°&LL ARE MAJQRS, R/0.:).No.376,
"gm moss, x.'m.NAGAR
DAVANGERE

 RESPONDENTS

(By Sri: P S RAJAGrG?AL FOR R1)

THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 106 OF CFC AGAINSI’ THE.
JUDGEMENT 55 DEGREE DATED 6.}2.2C£3 PASSED {N
§9Z.A.N(} 45/1996 ON THE FILE OF’ THE {ST AEDDL. CIVIL
JUDGE (SR.DN.), SAVANGERE, BISMISSING THE APPEAL

-2-

AND C(‘}NFiRMING THE JUDGEMENT .=-’14a’fI%:s ‘:§.’1ié:a:;”:I”‘_’:::E:”.
DATED 11.4.95 PASSED IN O.S.NO.348{.88.._Cf2N p”1_LE.»

OF THE PRL. MUNSWF, DAVAN(I§’:E¥?E*.«. &

THIS APPEAL COMING oN “§+'<)%éTHEARI.Nc3.?Hi$

THE COURT DELIVERED T}iE_P'OLLQ\VING:,~"" '

. JUQC_§B_3i3_:'__3L§1'

The matter was and again at 2.45
pm. NOIIC appgiaxfed fof ..:H"éfi1ce, the appeal is

dismissed for 1:1c§é;ii__pzus§ecu£ion.,«- 7 .

Sd/-'
JUDGE