High Court Kerala High Court

T.Rajesh vs State Of Kerala on 30 October, 2007

Kerala High Court
T.Rajesh vs State Of Kerala on 30 October, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 1032 of 2007(W)


1. T.RAJESH, LAB ASSISTANT (M.R.R.T.V),
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. DIRECTOR,

3. SMSN VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.A.SHAJI

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :30/10/2007

 O R D E R
                         S.SIRI JAGAN,J
             ======================
                    W.P.(C).No.1032 of 2007
             =============-===========
             Dated this the 30th day of October, 2007


                           JUDGMENT

The petitioner was appointed as Lab Assistant (MRRTV) in

the 3rd respondent’s school which is an aided school. Such

appointment has not been approved yet on the ground that the

petitioner does not possess the prescribed qualifications.

Special Rules in aided Vocational Higher Secondary Sector has

not been promulgated so far. By Ext.R2(a) dated 01.03.2004

Government directed that the draft special rules as approved by

Public Service Commission is made applicable to aided sector

also. As per the draft rules the qualification prescribed for Lab

Assistant is pass in V.H.S.E Course in the concerned branch or

equivalent qualification. The petitioner would submit that pass

in ITI and ITC are equivalent to pass in V.H.S.E course. In

support of the same, the petitioner relies on Exts.P4, P5 and P9.

Ext.P4 is the recommendation from the Director of V.H.S.E to

the Government recommending the case of the petitioner for

approval of appointment, considering his qualifications as

equivalent to V.H.S.E. Ext.P5 is the query from the Director to

W.P.(C).No.1032/2007

2

the Government as to whether ITC can be regarded as equivalent

to V.H.S.E. In Ext.P9 the Government has held that seven

V.H.S.E courses will be treated as alternative qualifications for

the selection to the posts in which K.G.T.E, KGCE,ITI and NCVT

are the prescribed qualifications. One of the courses is

Maintenance and Repairs of Radio and Television(MRRTV). The

petitioner would contend that if pass in V.H.S.E can be treated

as alternative qualification for ITI which is equivalent to ITC,

ITC can also be treated as alternative qualification for the

selection to the post for which V.H.S.E is the prescribed

qualification.

2. The learned Government Pleader with the help of the

counter affidavit disputes the contentions of the petitioner.

According to the Government Pleader there is no Government

Order recognising ITC or ITI as equivalent to V.H.S.E.

3. After hearing both sides I am of the opinion that in

view of Exts.P4, P5 and P9, the Government should address itself

as to the question whether pass in ITI or ITC can be considered

as equivalent to pass in V.H.S.E. Orders in this regard shall be

W.P.(C).No.1032/2007

3

passed within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of

this judgment. The question approval of the petitioner’s

appointment as Lab Assistant shall be considered on the basis of

the orders to be passed by the Government as directed above.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
dvs