BANGALQRxE-§6'V
IN THE HIGH CGURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALGRE
DATED THIS THE 10" BAY OF 3UNE, 2009
BEFGRE
THE Homme MR; 3u7ST1-::E A.N.VEN£}G0?ALA .gc~;1@"a%.%m;V'_T.'v. H
WRIT PETITIQN :x:o.1231sz:2'e'5t)s%{«3m>,$«
WRIT PETITION No.12316/'é'{?i3LE3._f+'3sE2)1§{'}V_* '~ = "
wax? PET"I'?"I€)¥\3_,J\.l.o.12;;§~;.*;,.~_;',V?':a%';§;_8'{3».8. {B DA}~..
BETWEEN: t A'
GANGADHARA Rfi;G MADD:_£VV'?A"{'i :
S/G VEERA [§A'{;E§'A§2 :3, %szc--T.TE--RaAcE
RAT NO 2-3;', 69 F'EET..MAIN._ R-'SAD
G BLGCK, SAH.AKARR._NAGAR};;
H.;.';'¥5ETE'E"IG¥\éER :5: w.w:a.3.233;5;29es
%g;-:,e;s KARA 3.521)"-MguLLAPw1
S11'-:OfVE?gAF'i,'3sif<RE:'3§~f£'s£vz9_§. am
AGED 49 ~r2Aas'; A
am?' we swag' '2, CLASSIC YERRACE
?f'LAT NO 22-.E, :30 FEET MAIN ROA5;
« .§'£ -BLOCK", .$;aHAKARA NAGAR,
% §:'é§sNGA..LfORE--96
.,....PETETI{3§'\£ER EN W.P.N0,12315;'20fi8
.. VEB/5=NGe€\§--,QRE~26
1 SMT PABMAVATHI
W/'C} $RI NAGARA3
AGED 59 YEARS
R/AT FURT N9 503,
KETHAN RESIDENCY
VIGNANANAGAR
BANGALORE
2 59.1 NAGARA3
s/0 LATE BHEEMAIAH
AGED 54 YEARS V ._
R;A'r FLAT NO 503, KETs~:AnsV«%»R_.E-srcezsscv M
VIGNANANAGAR.
3ANGALORE M
.....PE"!"£TI'1}$*éE'R5$;,Ii'¢ v¢,'P.,jr\so,1231?/2902
(av SR1 K E-{AmiMfiNTHARfi\Y*A:PP}€k,..§a{}%§;'.I!§iffi§Ei. THE
i3E'"F'IT'EONS;)'"~ ." 'A j
"mg sA§:GA:,IaE t3&ii9;éL
K1.}MfixR§'-'s -PARK 'w.£s':*
RE? av zT¥s'+£:,0:w1ssIoni%ER
R£S?€:>$xéE3§§'éT
(Common in aii the 3 aases}
V {av Ségz R:t{MAN3A:vE¥A savsgazx, Aw.)
' " VTWRIT PETITIGN §\§6.12315,/2G§8 ES FREE UNBER
*.AR:§'§C_3..ES 226 AND 22? OF THE CC}NE'::TITUT§§N GF EKEDIA
TC) DIRECT THE RESPONDENT Tfi ALLOT AN
ALTERNATTVE SITES MEASURING EAST TO WEE”? ?6+5G,/2
‘<,FEVE"T AND NORTH TO SOUTH 96 FEET CR AN EQUAL
ITJIMENSIGN IN AW! OTHER LAYOUT FORMEQ BY IT
wzrwou"? CHARGENG ANY EXTRA AMGUNTV.
{CONSIDERING THEIR REPRESENTATIONS
wars’ PETETION NO.12316/2008 IS me:-i’f£>:?’ u%§:::j§%%2Ji[%%”‘§’%T
ARTICLES 225 AM’) 227 as ‘ms CGNSTITUTIG–?\I.._€§F E~§fiZ*.IA
PRAYING TG mass? THE RES?GE%2§’E’?!7? “Eta _.Ai7_i-.v€2T A122;
ALTERNATIVE SITE ¥’v?£ASURiNG EAST :’i’.’QfiW’E’ST 5-E3’F£EETa;;
AND NORTH T6 scum 90 FEET:-._<3R AN'~.vEQ£JA'L "
mmemszom IN ANY GTHERJHAYQUT 'F0RfVh%£}A,VBY :7'
wm-:auT CHARGING ANY ..__ 'EXTRA A-&f§C}L§§"r«…., av
comsxnmzws THEIR Revaesamzzafzorgs gegmwxtga.
WRIT PETITEON N<3;w:2317,{2,o%'z:,=8v.V;':~:;.% FELED Lsmssa
ARTICLES 225 AND 227 o§="f:'HEic:'s:;:«:sTzf£*a;";'*z<:TRA~AM'aium*-av'=mr~ssIDER.ING THEER
REmEse?s3frATIL*2;<~:' F%:D,RTI~£WI.TH;
Thesé=§:;é’titi§hs;,C;:§’s-nE’:fi’gV”‘fin in prefiminary hearéag ‘B’
group thés ciay;~.th’e.Cf<[2urt_ma"de the feflewing:
….. 4} R 3 E R
ivthévsg writ petitions are posteé $3 '8' graup,
with Athé ca.é*;'saLi:'i:t.T:'of iearned cozmsei cf bath the sédes, the
éazgfit pet'Et.§<}ins are taken L233 fer firm disposaé.
A' *2.. "The getitizmers centend that their preperfies ware
" _4aVcqu}ired for the scheme 'Periph-era? Ring Read'. The
"*pietitEoners' claim is that, they are entified to be afiotted
aiternate sites, since their vahsahie prafserty 133$ beer':
acquired by the respondent. Having subm§tte_§§.. _?th=é.,_
representatfims far aimtment sf aitarrzate sites _
net received any reply from the re§;genden–t;*"t§%j§3?;f'fiaase '4
apgareached this Court, ta direct tfie r§'»,5,«:3;%;r{d,;e.:%:i:
aiternate sites of equai dimensisg. in 3'r2y"'§ayo:.z°*:"t§f;at_Hm§;y V%
be formed by the resp'ondentV:;"fifvithcuf"~»:.§faEg¥:i§; any
amount.
3. The respofifignt f}}ed.:Vfiagizegrhéfrsg of ebgectézzns
contersdisfgj’ §:a :k£_’§ wehrénotéfied fer acquésitiar:
for the fcfmatisn’ef §iVeE§p’%+éra%”‘rifi§ mad and preééminary
netéfication wéé ifssuéd tin 35.11.2096 whéch was feficwed
;3i.<3tificat¥on' dé"téd 29.06.2801 Though the finai
§"£'¢=_t§'féV;;_a§t§0:tf§'-fiaé'jiééen issued acqzfiring the properfies, the
awardfzas vz'2.é_*.: yé':: been passed and possession sf acquired
-4.7;-v44._l'<Tar1d has"s'2gAiE; been taken and handaé ever t9 the EDA. It is
-.’:’éz’;~:»”a_I;::’e:_1_ 5333:, since he award is passed ané gessesszisn has
…_}§a’t’_’¥3een taken, the question of aiiotting aétamate sites t§
“»».. $i%*:e petitécners, does not arise at this stage. A :’esn§ui:éerr
/
dated 17.11.2306 passee in subject P4e.i46f2C85 has been
produced, with regard to the peiicy decision takee.
4, Having heard the iearneei ceense£ M
sides, in View of the undieputed fac;f:’tha~t, ‘a4aefaar:v£u*i;Ve_s:1–Aef (the”‘p.Aet%§ien§.fs~_,x T’i
has not been taken ever, these w.f§t~..pet%tiens’¥’9r”v_£s§–:§§”r’ég ef
dérections for aliotment of..eitern-ateysifes, are ‘gsrerravjature.
However, if the award in 4fe”:~:_.pe£:t.v?3’f:VaeQ$£§erefi..Iands of the
petitioners is pa.s:3e{i.._anz_i p:es;fiesf5i~ef’:’:.._is’ teiien over, the
respoedeaet Se _in.–vV£erms of its resoiutéce
dated G?.1i,?.0Q5’pe$eieeV_¥’2<2£ §s.sE.*§wje<:t 549.146/2096 ené aiéet
aiternete..siL§es'uE"'r: tfiefe of 1:6 the §3et§t§oners.
'v«.7§%he_v.§rit%:§etiticns stand diseased of accerdingéy.
'
Sd/-~
ledge