High Court Kerala High Court

Smt.Sunanda vs State Of Kerala on 14 September, 2009

Kerala High Court
Smt.Sunanda vs State Of Kerala on 14 September, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 4884 of 2009()


1. SMT.SUNANDA, AGED 54 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. MS.SHARON, AGED 21 YEARS,
3. SRI.T.S.ARJUNAN, AGED 50 YEARS,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.MURALEEDHARAN PILLAI

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :14/09/2009

 O R D E R
                       K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                     ---------------------------
                     B.A. No. 4884 of 2009
                 ------------------------------------
           Dated this the 14th day of September, 2009

                            O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438

of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are the

accused persons in Crime No.333/2009 of Kovalam Police

Station.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under

Sections 323, 324, 342, 354, 366 A and 372 read with Section

34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. When the Bail Application came up for hearing on

26.08.2009, the following order was passed:

” Heard the learned counsel for the

petitioners as well as the learned Public

Prosecutor.

It is submitted by the learned counsel

for the petitioners that the petitioners are

prepared to appear before the investigating

officer on any day fixed by this court.

Accordingly, there will be a direction that the

petitioners shall appear before the

investigating officer on 28.08.2009 and

29.08.2009 at 9 A.M.

B.A. No. 4884 of 2009 2

Post on 09.09.2009.

It is submitted by the learned Public

Prosecutor that the petitioners will not be

arrested till then.”

4. It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that in

compliance with the order dated 26.08.2009, the petitioners

appeared before the Investigating Officer and their statements

were recorded.

5. In the facts and circumstances mentioned above, I am

of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the

petitioners. There will be a direction that in the event of the

arrest of the petitioners, the officer in charge of the police station

shall release them on bail on their executing bond for Rs.

25,000/- each with two solvent sureties for the like amount to

the satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the following

conditions:

A) The petitioners shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and when
required;

B) The petitioners shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the

B.A. No. 4884 of 2009 3

evidence.

C) The petitioners shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail.

D) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

ln