Mr V K Bhandari vs The Central Bureau Of … on 8 September, 2008

 

M '

  53:; Sf? Hsaayagmgnm KL: 

EH TEE PEQH CQURT SF KfifiA'%'.&Im 1%? 32%}? (}1_'LL{f.3RE

Efi&T';Ei;B ms TEE W my my SEE-"PE§&ER 

BEFGRE _   Z
'ma H$§'ELE zm.._:§3s*n:cE%%»1~:.1a;1¢.¢&::1§;k%k;%4  =

cafiamaa Pmrmn 2;{'2;i24;'?s3a4%%m>é%% if   %

EEEWE-EN:

rgr.v.§LBhamm~i    3
&ga1a%u'£.fi4-yaafi    'A   
3;a,$1+u~i§«ganc.hmd   "  
Fgyrmmfijg General kmflar  _  '
fifmiral Ema}: csfizzdéa  "  I  '
fifamiml ifkficci.     
P§'mntE5r       »

 

Wallam.  '
Slaatm Rmrasfi " V' 

  .4  _ --
 my.' - 'jg  V ~ %_ % .,,PE'1"I'I"1G}.'*§ER

{By  B'."v'.«1§;=:,2&a.€§,=;a g;  ,% 3
1 , ' -. ~.

_ a.-'quanta-anon  V ~ . . - - - ~

  figfifiwi :>f£21'imtiga%n

' Tam; Bf.'=«f5'£:;," ajeilary Rsaaacé

   1: aflndia

 ';%};*a:s«c?é3r €:;::rpm*ata m3:%'t%$2:eteé
A  rim  -as:  '.,'Z';::em§a@%

    

:5..-

A  _ iiiixgziisiaiisn and Tramsar 55 I.Tndc 

fi.--€:;'.%:; §%Ef3, iavitg figs émazi 353$ ai

  .1;'.."§§:a.2z°§§m'mu.1%i§ H  ?mi:::;

 

~;--4% 523. wR§3%HE'I'S

 

, £c:1'%:,,}

  WHIHKIWHU .lI\ run-tn--- v--- - -



 

This petition coming on for admis'sion"&isiday~,  ii A

Court made the following;
Q._R_D_1£_R

Heard Sri B.V.AchaIya;.'  Qounsel

appearing for petitionen 

2. The.   that the
observations   17 of the
order in  5.2.2008 has been
made the basis    of Investigation
to    filed hy accused

No.2.

 3--,V Srihuu  learned Senior Counsel

up  . "the observations made by this Court in the
 2,     are factually incorrect and there is

 to hold that there was conspiracy between

N oJmpmc{_ -

 No.2 and other accused.

IH vxvivmnrx so Limos Hem vxvivnuvx ao nmn-u unn-
 _ .



 

URI' 0!' KARNAIAKA I-RG1-I COUR1

_ __ 'VW€$ ..--...---u-urn'--='=I-stair! -t.-utn:-: UFKARNATAKA I-HGI-'E COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH {:0

 

. ?'>'a*2E'v.5c"w
4. in the ultimate ;_ ' I
V' 1,",

5.2.2008

, this Court has held that observations made L
the order dated 5.2.2008 shall not be read as expre.’;;:s§io:43:e A

of opinion on merits and they are made onlyfor

of the petition [Cr1.R.P.No.1859/2005)

5. In View of what has beert
portion of order in Crl.RP.N<§:,1'_i:359i_}'é'§§t)e,_it'is c1a:ifiéd
that learned Sessione Jucigei the
application for law,
without being ofgier made in

Cr1.R.P.No. 1859/20:051.' A

6. The petititiI1_Visvvdiep0$euci*eif accordingly.

Sd/-3;

Judge

of the order dated

Him!-5 WWWVMKW! so lanes Ham Wnfllumnwu 4,. .u…….