High Court Kerala High Court

V.T.Fouly vs The District Collector on 2 September, 2010

Kerala High Court
V.T.Fouly vs The District Collector on 2 September, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 8680 of 2010(H)


1. V.T.FOULY, AGED 35 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CHIEF OFFICER,

3. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.O.XAVIER

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :02/09/2010

 O R D E R
                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.

             ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                     W.P.(C) No. 8680 of 2010 H
             ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````
             Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2010

                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioner submits that he is the owner of 50 cents

of land in Survey No.1915/2 of Vamanapuram Village in

Nedumangad Taluk. According to the petitioner, he wants to

remove soil from the said land for the purpose of making a fresh

water fish pond for aquaculture purpose. For the said purpose, he

made Ext.P4 application to the District Collector, which, according

to the petitioner, was duly recommended by the Village Officer.

There is no progress in the matter and, therefore, the writ petition

is filed.

2. It is now pointed out that in terms of the Kerala Miner

Mineral Concession(Amendment) Rules, 2010, a proviso has been

added to Rule 5, which says that an application for obtaining

permission for digging up of ponds or wells or tanks and for the

renovation of stagnant water bodies in patta lands, for purposes

including aquaculture, No Objection Certificate of the District

Collector as stipulated in Rule 5(5) is not mandatory. The Rule

provides that if an application is made to the Government

WPC.8680/2010
: 2 :

accompanied by a certificate from the Agriculture Officer or Officer

in Charge of Marine Products Export Development Auhority or

Department of Fisheries or Village Officer or the local authority

concerned to the effect that the applicant is in need of digging the

pond for aquaculture purpose, the application will be considered.

3. Since, according to the petitioner, the pond is

constructed for aquaculture purposes, it is not necessary for the

petitioner to obtain certificate from the District Collector, as sought

for by him. On the other hand, the course open to the petitioner is

to make appropriate application to the Government as provided in

Rule 57 of the Kerala Miner Mineral Concession Rules, enclosing

the certificate as mentioned in the proviso to Rule 5(5) mentioned

above. It is directed that if such an application is made by the

petitioner, necessary action shall be taken thereon.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
aks

// True Copy //

P.A. To Judge