High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Simpal Kumari vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 29 July, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Simpal Kumari vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 29 July, 2011
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               LPA No.630 of 2011

                  Simpal Kumari d/o Sri Vedbhushan Prasad Singh,
                  Resident of village Nirpur, P.S. Chautham
                  District Khagaria,                        ... Appellant.
                                     Versus
                            1.The State Of Bihar.
                            2.The Principal Secretary, Human Resources
                               Department, Bihar, Patna.
                            3.The District Teacher Appointment Appellate
                              Tribunal, Khagaria. Through its Member, Khagaria,
                              Bihar.
                            4.The District Magistrate, Khagaria.
                            5.The District Superintendent of Education, District
                              Khagaria.
                            6.The Block Education Extension Office,
                              Chautham, District Khagaria.
                            7.The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj,
                              Nirpur, P.S. Chautham, District Khagaria.
                            8.The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj, Nirpur,
                              P.S. Chautham District Khagaria.
                            9.Asha Kumari d/0 Sri Ashok Kumar, R /0 village
                              Nirpur,
                              P.S. Chautham District Khagaria, ...    Respondents.
                                   -----------

3. 29.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel

for the State and perused the order of the writ court.

The authorities have acted rightly to enquire and ensure

that the person having more marks should be appointed as teacher, in

place of the appellant who not only had lesser marks but was suspected

to have received favour as she was daughter of the concerned Mukhiya.

The writ court, in our view, has rightly refused to interfere. A person

having more marks has better claim and is expected to be a better

teacher.

This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

It goes without saying that if there are other posts

vacant, the appellant will be at liberty to apply against those posts and to

compete with others in accordance with law.





                                                      (Shiva Kirti Singh,J)



       Jay/                                          ( Shivaji Pandey, J)