High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Syed Wasimuddin Ahmad & Anr vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 28 July, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Syed Wasimuddin Ahmad & Anr vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 28 July, 2011
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    CWJC No.1424 of 2007
                   1. SYED WASIMUDDIN AHMAD SON OF LATE SYED ZAMIRUDDIN
                      RESIDENT OF MOHALLA KABIR MOHALLA, NAWADIH ROAD, P.S.
                      AURANGABAD, DISTRICT AURANGABAD.
                   2. MAZHAR ALAM SON OF HASAN IMAM, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA
                      NAWADIH, P.S. AURANGABAD, DISTRICT AURANGABAD.
                                         Versus
                    1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
                    2. SECRETARY CUM INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION,
                       PATNA, BIHAR.
                    3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AURANGABAD.
                    4. DISTIRCT MAGISTRATE, NAWADA.
                    5. DISTRICT SUB-REGISTRAR, AURANGABAD.
                    6. DISTRICT SUB-REGISTRAR, NAWADA.
                                                 -----------

02. 28.07.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted

to correct the averments made in paragraph-5 of the writ

petition as counsel states that petitioner no.1 joined the post

of Extra Clerk in the office of the District Sub-Registrar,

Aurangabad with effect from 16.5.1983.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed

supplementary affidavit in which statement has been made

that petitioner no.2 passed the departmental accounts

examination in the year 2006, which is taken on record.

3. This writ petition has been filed stating that

petitioners joined the office of the District Sub-Registrar,

Aurangabad on the post of Extra Clerk with effect from

16.5.1983 and 7.5.1983 respectively. In consideration of the

satisfactory service rendered by both the petitioners they

were appointed as lower division clerk with effect from

1.7.2004 and joined the office of the District Sub-Registrar,
2

Lakhisarai.

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that

till date they are serving as lower division clerk and have

not been considered for any promotion including time

bound promotion/ACP benefit. It is further submitted that

period of service rendered as Extra Clerk is also to be taken

into account for grant of time bound promotion/ACP

benefit.

5. Let the petitioners represent before the

competent authority for grant of time bound

promotion/ACP benefit by filing representation annexing a

copy of this order. Representation praying inter alia for

grant of time bound promotion/ACP benefit be considered

by the competent authority, as early as possible, in any case

within three months from the date of its receipt. It goes

without saying that if petitioners are allowed promotion

they be paid the financial benefit accruing therefrom within

the same time.

6. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed

of.

( V. N. Sinha, J.)
Rajesh/