IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2524 of 2011
SURINDER CHOUDHARY, SON OF LATE PHAGUNI CHOUDHARY
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADHAUL, P.O. MOTIPUR, VIA TAJPUR,
P.S. TAJPUR, DIST. SAMASTIPUR.
Versus
1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, SRI
SUNIL MITRA, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE(REVENUE)
CUSTOM AND CENTRAL EXCISE NORTH BLOCK NEW
DELHI.
2. THE CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF CUSTOM AND CENTRAL
EXCISE, SRI S. DUTT MAJUMDAR, DEPARTMENT OF
REVENUE, GOVT. OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI.
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOM AND CENTRAL EXCISE,
SMT. RINA ARYA, NOIDA B.123, SECTOR V NOIDA U.P.
4. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOM AND CENTRAL
EXCISE SRI BISHWAJIT DUTTA, REVENUE BUILDING,
BIRCHAND PATEL MARG, PATNA.
---------------
03. 23.09.2011 Counsel for the Central Excise Department
states that in compliance of the order of the High
Court dated 13.12.2010, Annexure-1 representation
of the petitioner dated 30.12.2006 has already been
considered and reasoned order communicated to the
petitioner, which fact is also accepted by the learned
counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the fact that order of the High
Court has already been complied with this contempt
petition is disposed of granting liberty to the
petitioner to challenge the order disposing of the
representation dated 30.12.2006 as also the
supplementary representation dated 19.01.2011
2
Annexure-2 which was also disposed of by the same
order by which the earlier representation has been
disposed of, against which petitioner has already filed
writ petition. Petitioner is also at liberty to raise all
the points in the writ petition, which has been raised
in the contempt petition.
Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)