The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs The New India Assurance Co Ltd on 22 October, 2008

1

IN THE HIGH comm" o:= KARNATAKA AT BANGA{.DRE "--..'

DATED THIS THE 22"" DAY or ocToB5R...?.'0o3;j.   % 

PRESERT ,-_»_., _
THE HON'BLE MR.3usTIcE J:-'C.'S{<;EEtDi5§AF_gt. fi  
THE Hor~:'BL2 MR.3USflCE__.C.R.'KU'M.ARA.$'§'JA§§¥ }

mcoavzs TAX ApPEA:.V%TT4§:.2?o C»? 2968 

1 THE COMMISSIONER oi 1;$icQr~?.;'=,_' TAX  ' '  ;, .. 
CRBUILDING_*@_    
QUEENS ROAD  1
BANGALQRE   . '

2 THE INCGMVE TAXIQFFICER mas) 
w:.mog:a(3;v.*T.     . .
c: R-au:'La1t~:Gs,..QtJEENs..Rc3A13
eAN<3.9.L<3RE '      " ...APPELLANTS

(ET sm:'M \_i  ADVOCATE)

    ..... 

*._THE’ NEW ENDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
T.m.Nf.:>;2_, BRIGADE PLAZA

ANANDARAO “<:3RcLfE "

BANGALORE 3-‘ Tsmoog …RESPONE)ENT

V {a§( “;;£2.1’: $4 wAvAL1, ADVOCATE)
* «..T:-us” 1NCOME TAX APPEAL IS ma: UNDER sscnow 260-A OF

‘ “£.T.ACT,”_« 1§61, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 11.10.2006 AND
..{fC3RRI\’3ENDUM DATED 2G.11.2006 PASSEE) IN ITA NO.1492fBANG,/2005

f __ “”FG¥<; THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20G3~2*304, PRAYENG TO FORMULATE THE
T " ~.SE._J_3STANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND TC} ALLGW
" THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOMEJAX

.. 'APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.1492/BANG/2005, DATED

11.10.2006 AND CORRIGENDUM E333-"¥'EE) 20.11.2006 ANO CONFIRM THE
ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER, CONFIRMING THE ORDER
PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (T93), WARD 16(3), BANGALORE.

o£/

k:~e_ T

2 ,
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS TH51f'5;DAY,
K. SREEDHAR RAG, 1., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

.1_!.LP_§_M_E_H.I

Sri.M.V.JavaIi takes notice for tho resoono'séntv.: 'Q .

x.A.2/zoos is aiiowed. The dé:ayn%§f2a3 days.;gnm%

the Appeai ls condoned.

The substantiai qti’:esat;ion_«”of’V_IVa~#;£:._ i§vo.|ved’viVn this appeai
is no more res-Jntagra decided in

favour of the rsavganiée in and other batch

91′ C3585; 5!? fiéfffls:%:6f» t%i§””3udoment rendered in the said
case, this Apnea} is Q

E’ …..

Iud§5

Sd/-gm
Iudge