High Court Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Arjun Singh vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 5 July, 2010

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Arjun Singh vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 5 July, 2010
     SBCWP NO.5746/2010 - ARJUN SINGH V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. :JUDGMENT DTD.5.7.2010



                                        1/3


 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

                                      JODHPUR.

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5746/2010

Arjun Singh

                                         Versus

State of Rajasthan and ors.



                                        PRESENT

              HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI

Mr.H.S.Sidhu, for the petitioner




DATE OF JUDGMENT                          : 5th July, 2010.


                                     JUDGMENT

1. Heard the learned counsel.

2. By Annex.2, candidature of the petitioner in the selection

process of Prabodhak was rejected on the ground vide item No.8 in

the impugned order that he does not hold the prescribed qualification

of BSTC.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he

entered into the said course of BSTC in the year 2006 and passed out
SBCWP NO.5746/2010 – ARJUN SINGH V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. :JUDGMENT DTD.5.7.2010

2/3

the same on 5.7.2009. The interview for selection on the post of

Prabodhak were first held, according to the petitioner in para 5, on

19.2.2010 and again on 29.6.2010. The petitioner further stated in

para 5 that ” the petitioner acquired the qualification of BSTC at the

time of interview and therefore, he was eligible to be considered for

the post of Prabodhak. The learned counsel for the petitioner relying

upon the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ashok

Kumar Sharma V/s Chander Shekhar and anr. reported in 1993

Supp. (2) SCC 611 submitted that the qualification on the date of

interview should be taken into account by the respondent – authorities

as it was considered in better public interest to widen the choice of

selection in the said manner.

4. From the perusal of para 5 and the impugned order

Annex.2 dtd.31.5.2010, it does not appear to this Court that the

petitioner ever informed formally or with some documents the

respondents – authorities about the factum of his having passed the

said eligibility qualification of BSTC in the year 2009. Mere

acquiring of said qualification even if it was to be true unless brought

to the notice of the respondents, the respondents authorities cannot be

faulted in passing the impugned order Annex.2 on 31.5.2010 rejecting

the candidature of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner

was not eligible as per the information given in the application filed

in the year 2008. Para 5 does not specifically state that the petitioner
SBCWP NO.5746/2010 – ARJUN SINGH V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. :JUDGMENT DTD.5.7.2010

3/3

brought it to the notice of the respondents that he has acquired the

qualification of BSTC before the earlier round of interview held on

19.2.2010.

5. Consequently, this Court is of the view that this writ

petition as has been framed cannot succeed. Accordingly the present

writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. A copy of this order

be sent to the respondents immediately.

(Dr.VINEET KOTHARI)J.

Item No.8
Ss/-