High Court Karnataka High Court

Suresh vs Ningappa on 25 February, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Suresh vs Ningappa on 25 February, 2010
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
 ~ . t R./' (2 'ii5fE§f€z1§\TKE';§{§;.4. %%%%% 14 .V
 'E3EJ3iPUF1:'---58_§ am

 :3 ,  gem ;~ ::fi?E;%;L§.;§?§i'E&'EA§
 _ 'gccb §%:@':;;?3E:«~;@m WGEQEK,
~ V  gage? ;v:L:n%A:xIKER:,
 ._ =§.'~§E~}A§3«§J§& -- 586 10:.

   3::mi Rgggaéixamza
..  " 53- ga SEf}EZ3ARAE1fE§aPPA

IN THE HIGH COURT 0:? KwNATfi3i$§ 
CIRCUIT BENCH AT GvLBARG;g:__ % 

zymm "FEES THE 25:32 IEAY 0_§i,Efg8_RLmé.é?f;:éé§%:'§:V -   
ESEFGRE'---.     1' A  %
THE HON'BI_,E MR. Jt?s":*:,.C.E §J1:}:*J <:.:§:€g;::;. 
R.F1A:_ rxz0,3:3§ }$§* ;2VQ;3:;?  * « % A
BETWEEN V  é  V 

1.

,SURESH., % _
S/Q
OCC. BUSI_E’$E;eSgSiIf._,._’;’. ‘V _; »
Rm MUm;NK:§:;RL.

i-3EJAPE§’F.%,..«.<~. 5'fi86 ~ '

5,10 §¢EA1}EWALE:?§:fi§ v "

KUMBAK gtkgjgggta 3.’? YE’;éE.jF’iS.
QCC-.SUSiNijSS,'” V

_E)}’€}”?vLr§§}E”%§1{%iiAPPA Karzvzmfi
AQSEEE 32: YFEARS;

ix}

KUMBEXR, £~’§,GE ?szIH\EC>R,
OCC.1\§ILg R,/Q C/O
L%PPEL£.£fiNT

SMT. l’v1ALE_AE\iI?»’I§3:.

D/fl MADEVEALAPPA
KUMBARg, REG MUR&NKERE,

BEJAPUR M 586 1.01. V “-H;L;§}.5i?v$LiAN*§§~. ‘

(BY SRE BABU H METAGUI}{§;5$:’;§£)V.V’,}2 . ‘
ANB A V’ %

1, Nzmmypag .

S/G MABIWALAPPA % if
iiumgag, gem «.512? YEARS
QCC. I4R:f’;;éfER; }
R20 MURfiNKi$RI; ”

BI3APU§W &
(DIED :3N §E’;f:j_;2GG5,

REE B”1*..”I,§«’;s,. 4

EaES?Q:\:aE:;a\;’:”‘ §E®;2′ f::*{:~

2, m.– 3:2/:3’.4 ‘E:.§;S;§;4:\:£zs,” 3

, A_ Wzgfs f–1:3:msrAppA “{{U_ ?s;§BAR,
‘rv,:A.;£>R;A’:>€<::: ii}: ivsmfi

3;' E; :gm:,1;:;i3,:é;a,

$;'e3"N1NGg%';%?:x KUMBAR,
_.AGE';i?3 2,?" '""£'7E3;%RS3

GC€§ C:O3~;"_}§JEE.

* 2&3, MA5§’%VAL%PPz§.

M 3,53 EREENGAFPA KUE1/EBAR,
AQEEE 22 YELAE€;§§
9&9 §\§EL.

E0 the pIain’i::i§”fs«: {i€3f£:°mi:;1:1i.§§ N{}.3, 4 mid 5 a%.r°€:”-tcfwi:

ab:~3:::e1u.t.€3 G’£?€§’i1€’.}’f’S <3? £219 :a2.z.£'{: property "Ehe e2é:i*i:::s:T.V§V::'%,}<;€§' H

pr'::_ pa1r*’1ifi<:::, geindf'-3e;i:a.{es§;;:A

p£:$Se$si0§1.

4. h”:e::ider:’tai1y if, is {G b%3″‘«if1<;~$iced ":h3§t"d€f€'I";da::ts
ihaugh €n'£€F€:d E:}}}£}vi§Z~}§:?;_iI1Cf3} fiat. :':;h0 c§sé to £116
wr'itt.ez1 statement, Héiigie "'i:~fr.i9&:;'e<;iiCE%::1::'é:–.of PW}. was

r6e::<;31*d;€:fi and E.'5§S1?.}L -'€a1'§'.{3 'vP.i:;'.-_ ~x§,=*6:1433_ fixéifked, Gm {he
bagis of ihe_..;;&E_§2;diz1gs :,t.§_i.a:3 ~.1§:'g,z.z%:: p{§é?;~*§ESsiGn of “(hair Share ta

22:3. extent, 8% %:}ié’ifj’;<?;1h;ar€:~ each in the E /3"? share
Sf fii'3('i-€321-'E§'{"3fi»d€3t}€*3;?E";{§§i;Oi…"'-N5,E" Aggrieveé by the gaid

jtzdgggjzéicsfit: 8.Z1{3 §.i§%{fr€<3' <ie§'€r:{§2m':.$ aye hefamé i:h1?$ Cfiizfé,

§.'.'

*1?}'<:,:%::':"f;'?:_g ihe §)e:m{ien(:y «sf this; appésrai an

é:§_§g;§§,:;::;:tZf§aééi…Es.§'§i'é€i 'EEE"f£.{§ffZ£' {}§:'{ie:* 4%: Eizfifi: 2? '$9.10 i:2<§.£<:3.'i.<:3:

5%
f

..–""

3′:

..«-‘

J?

,1

I.

,1″

VE:%ia1f::a:-gd tria§~Ju;%§g€ ES Séil asifiew

. _ 3;j:*:-::i :§%:”‘sJ§’:a§E be i”§3§}E,ii€}”3b€Z”€§ in fig arigainai mimgberp

when the party 3€eE<:i.r::g ta praduce evidencg_ ?%r;%§é,:"~VA;;;;::i;&
atria ta do 53 £01' 'the yeagons staiafi
hawevar, I am 9f the View tbtéfif "§h~i:*i
requireé to be pmduced _i:<:: x €:1éi2_EA§
graneuncfi 3. jufigemant ar115G'%«:fGs* axsi;:b$'t.fi;.fi.é;§v'VVgauge.
Having said so, I am. '§§.A_the«"%.}§§fs%}':.f;§;»§t-_theéé d§cume1':ts
are required is baa the Written
statement, which and the
evidafica to be CG§}8€qU€}f3EEy

the fOH(}¥§;'if}.§§ OX°:&¢i" V .

G§§éR
' 1 9. ;:;;;;V§e:;§j§ agggweg

2. f§’E*z:e f§;;¥’;:§’;g5jséi’I:€§1i and éecree gasséd by the

:3′.._?’i”f:’é mafia? £5: rerniiiad ta {he Eeamgd triaé Juége