Ramesh Kumar And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 13 July, 2009

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                     CHANDIGARH.

                                                C.W.P. No. 10175 of 2009
                                        DATE OF DECISION : 13.07.2009

Ramesh Kumar and others

                                                       .... PETITIONERS

                                   Versus

State of Haryana and others

                                                     ..... RESPONDENTS


CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL


Present:    Mr. N.S. Bhinder, Advocate,
            for the petitioners.

                        ***

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )

The petitioners, who are working as Assistant Fire Station

Officers, Firemen, Leading Firemen and Driver Operators, in various

Market Committees under the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board,

have filed this petition for quashing the advertisements No. 14/2007 dated

9.11.2007 (Annexure P-4), 1/2009 dated 10.1.2009 (Annexure P-5) and the

corrigendum (Annexure P-6), published on 3.2.2009 in the daily news paper

`The Tribune, Chandigarh’ in respect of posts of Accountant, Mandi

Supervisor and Auction Recorder.

It is the case of the petitioners that they had filed a

representation dated 22.5.2009, copy of which has been annexed as

Annexure P-3, for change of their cadre of Fire Staff under Rule 21 of the
CWP No. 10175 of 2009 -2-

Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board Service Rules, 2008, but the

said representation has not been considered and decided so far. In the said

representation, the petitioners have stated that their cadre should be changed

and they should be absorbed in the cadre of Accountant, Mandi Supervisor

and Auction Recorder. They further state that if their cadre is changed, they

are ready to loose their seniority also.

In view of the above, after hearing counsel for the petitioners,

without issuing notice of motion to the respondents, as it will un-necessary

delay the matter, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent

No.2 to consider and decide the representation dated 22.5.2009 (Annexure

P-3), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of

three months.

July 13, 2009                              ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL )
ndj                                                 JUDGE