-1-
EN THE KIGH mum' 032' KA"R'i¥iA'r?;s.1;2\_Afr :S§A:»:j§;,é;;§QI§';'<:
DATED THIS THE, 1332:5555'. _£j1'«' *200'8 '*~» 'V
?'1:{E:--3ENT'. ' .
THE HON'BLE MRQ...;J'u'fi'; .. agziculturist,
" V _ R; Hitucialaga,
" «Bu [}i.$t:~:;f3e:1gaum. .. Appellants
R Shindc, Aév.)
VV Tbs Syeciai Land Acquisificm. oflicer,
Belgaum Development Authority,
Beiaum. .. Respondent
(By Sri Sa-chin Kulgad, Adv. For M/_s.Basava Prabhu S Patii
Asseciates)
…2_
This M.F’.A. is flied under:”;S€-éfion54(1} §)f
Acquisition Act, praying to enhatzce :_ths–T’c3;npe11saii«§1§ frrsm
Rs.?’,0{)(}/~ per gunta to Rs.15,0()O,f__« p;~>r gu1ii*a’3L;z1 respéeztof
83;, NQ.163/EA measuring acres 23 gamtasv Sgnnasl aibng ;
with other benefits afld the _§ud7gment a;1d’V.ai7§1a1i3V gfiassad by
the Caurt of First Aaiditiatmal cm Judge (‘E2-1i. Du.) ‘fselgaum in
LAC No.13] 1998 dated ._13.4,20G5 be”‘:z3odifieti’aca::ording1y.
This M.F.A. f’:’Of;1 IGIIISTS this day,
MANJUNATH .J_ deliverfiri the ‘fQ11!Q-Wi’nig;’ j_ ..
Thérg days ivn”fi1i;ng the appeal.
2. fE>’r__1:i;r:€ respondent has no objection to
conéohé vdélafl the delay in fiijng the appeal
is _§¢éndoned§” .. V I
V _ is by the appellant stwkfing enhancement
.’ o f’ deiermincé. by the Reference Court in LAC
N§>..1:”3,z_:99s by judgment dated 13.4.2095 passed 53; the
” ~ ;1€a«1′:r1¢V:’:d I Addifional Civi}. Judge (Sr. 1313.), Belgaum.
4. By consent of both the parties, we have heard this
apiaeal on merits. 62/
-4-
other statutoxy benefits. In the fizvé
allowed. The market value 4.:
Cmlzrt at Rs.7,000/ — per is; –
‘3″!
gunta ané furthezr the appil/lflfit is ‘ for gather benefits?
” ‘ ‘ a §«;?,»gg4-i:-§5;;. gm 5%’
as contemplatxzd urgifjzr tlée %
this appea1i§a1Iowe§1,_ T’ ‘
:§=:.a&/$.95 améfifg
Act. Accordingly}?! ‘
1:116 appellant is cntititid
fox mf1L::x:id,_6f ”
13m. i} %
Sd/-._§__’
Iudga
Sd/—
Tudqe
<3"