High Court Kerala High Court

Pareeth vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 15 June, 2007

Kerala High Court
Pareeth vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 15 June, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 1741 of 2007()


1. PAREETH, S/O MOITHEEN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.P.UDAYABHANU

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :15/06/2007

 O R D E R
                            V.RAMKUMAR, J.

                          ----------------------------

             Crl.M.C.Nos. 1741/07, 1748/07 & 1760/07

                                      IN

                             B.A.2734/2007

                         -----------------------------

                 Dated this  15th  day of June, 2007


                               O R D E R

Cr.M.C.1741/2007 is filed by the accused in

Crime No.67/2007 of Pothanicadu police station for

offences punishable under Sections 447 and 307 IPC,

with regard to an occurrence which took place on

25.4.2007 at 8.30 a.m, in which one Mydeen was allegedly

attacked by the petitioner resulting in a deep cut on the

right hand and amputation of the right palm of the said

Mydeen. Without noticing the gravity of the injuries and

inclusion of Section 307 IPC in the offences registered, on

15.5.2007 this Court granted anticipatory bail to the

accused (Pareeth).

2. Evidently taking note of the seriousness of the

Crime and the grant of anticipatory bail in such a case,

the State has filed Crl.M.C.1760/2007 for cancellation of

the bail. The accused has filed Crl.M.C.1741/2007 for

correction of the bail order so as to include Section 307

IPC as well. Mydeen, the injured, has filed

Crl.M.C.1748/2007 also for cancellation of bail.

Crl.M.C.Nos.1741, 1748 & 1760/2007

2

3. When these applications came up for further

hearing today, the learned counsel for the accused, the

petitioner in Crl.M.C.1741/2007, submitted that he may

be permitted to withdraw the bail application.

Accordingly B.A.2734/2007 is permitted to be withdrawn

and the order for anticipatory bail granted in that

application will stand recalled.

The applications are disposed of as above.

V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs