High Court Kerala High Court

M.V.Sajev vs State Of Kerala on 11 January, 2011

Kerala High Court
M.V.Sajev vs State Of Kerala on 11 January, 2011
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 823 of 2011(C)


1. M.V.SAJEV, JUNIOR SUPERINTENENT,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SIMON THOMAS K., U.D.C.,
3. RAMESH V.R., U.D.C.,
4. MANI P.N., U.D.C.,
5. V.K.NAMASIVAN, U..C.,
6. NANDAKUMARAN C.G., L.D.C.,
7. VINCENT P.A., L.D.C.,
8. VIJAYAN P.K., SENIOR GRADE TYPIST,
9. MOHANAN P., UPPER DIVISION TYPIST,
10. MOHANDAS K.K., DRIVER GRADE - I,
11. BALAKRISHNAN T.S., DRIVER GRADE - I,
12. RAJAN C.I., DRIVER,
13. MOHANAN T.V., CHOWKIDAR II,
14. SHALIVAHAN E.B., LASCAR,
15. JANARDHANAN C., LAASCAR G II,
16. CHANDRAN C.M., PTS,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL N.C.C.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.R.JAGADEESH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :11/01/2011

 O R D E R
                              S. Siri Jagan, J.
                =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                         W.P(C) No. 823 of 2011
                =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
               Dated this, the 11th day of January, 2011.

                             J U D G M E N T

The petitioners in this writ petition entered Government service

after putting in prior military service. For the purpose of granting of

higher grade, they want the military service also to be taken into

account. According to them, they are so entitled to in view of Ext. P5

judgment of this Court. In the above circumstances, the petitioners

have filed Exts.P8(a) to P8(p) representations before the 2nd

respondent. The petitioners seek a direction to the 2nd respondent to

consider and pass orders on Exts.P8(a) to P8(p) representations in the

light of Ext.P5 judgment expeditiously.

2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ

petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass

orders on Exts.P8(a) to P8(p) representations, as expeditiously as

possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of

receipt of a copy of this judgment. While passing orders, the 2nd

respondent shall consider the applicability of Ext. P5 judgments and

to the facts of the petitioners’ case.

Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.

Tds/

[TRUE COPY]

P.S TO JUDGE.