High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ramdeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar on 26 July, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Ramdeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar on 26 July, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Cr. Misc. No.15638 of 2011
                           Ramdeo Sah son of Late Moti Sah
                                       Versus
                                 The State Of Bihar
                                      -----------

3/ 26.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that apart from suspicion there is no cogent

material against the petitioner and there was earlier land dispute

between the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on

bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two

sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by

the court below to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Purnea, in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No.105 of 2010,

subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close

relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and another

bailor shall be Jitan Kumr Sah, son of the petitioner. The bailors will

undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the

address of the petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that

the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he

shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on

affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is

implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the

present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to

initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of
2

misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will

receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date

fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and

delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled

for reasons of misuse, and (v) That the petitioner will be well

represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive

dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

JA/-                                             (Anjana Prakash,J.)