High Court Kerala High Court

Sankari Sasidharan @ Salini vs The Director General Of Police on 12 June, 2008

Kerala High Court
Sankari Sasidharan @ Salini vs The Director General Of Police on 12 June, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(Crl.).No. 163 of 2008(S)


1. SANKARI SASIDHARAN @ SALINI,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER,

3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

5. SANTHOSH KUMAR, S/O.VASU, B.7, ALSA

6. SURESH, B.7, ALSA APARTMENTS,

7. OMANA, W/O.VASU, B.7, ALSA APARTMENTS,

8. VALSALA, W/O.SURESH, B.7,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.RAJENDRAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.D.KISHORE

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :12/06/2008

 O R D E R
                             P.R.RAMAN &
                  T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,JJ.
              -------------------------------
                   W.P.(Crl)NO.163 OF 2008
             --------------------------------
                Dated this the 12th day of June, 2008

                               JUDGMENT

Raman, J.

This is a petition for habeas corpus filed by the mother of the

alleged detenu. It is alleged that the father of the child has taken the

child and kept under his illegal custody. The child was produced and

this Court passed an order on 29/5/2008 to give temporary custody of

the child to the petitioner-mother.

2. We have heard both sides.

3. Since the child is only 10 months old, necessarily the child is

to be with the mother for the time being and therefore we have already

given temporary custody of the child to the mother. However, that

does not mean that the 5th respondent-father is to be denied visitorial

rights and also future custody of the child in changed circumstances.

Therefore, we make it clear that the order giving the child in the

custody of the mother is purely provisional and it is open to the parties

to approach the Family Court for appropriate relief in which event the

Family Court will consider the matter in the light of the materials

-2-
WP(Crl).No.163/2008

available on record and pass appropriate orders.

Writ Petition is closed.

P.R.RAMAN,
Judge.

T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
Judge.

kcv.