High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Sadhu Sharan Paswan vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 7 December, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Sadhu Sharan Paswan vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 7 December, 2010
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        CWJC No.4850 of 2006
                      SADHU SHARAN PASWAN
                              Versus
                     THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
                             -----------

03 07.12.2010 The petitioner had filed a writ petition being C.W.J.C.

No. 1087 of 2003 for a direction to the respondents to consider his

case for promotion to the post of Organizer in the Sugarcane

Department. The writ petition was disposed of on 27.02.2003 with

a direction to the Cane Commissioner, Bihar to decide the matter

and take a decision. The Cane Commissioner by his order dated

11.07.2003 held that there was no utilization of the said post and a

decision had been taken to abolish the post and, as such,

petitioner’s case for promotion to the said post could not be

considered. That was 2003. Petitioner has come to this Court

once again for the same relief on the ground that the post is in

existence and there is no decision to abolish the same.

Once again a counter affidavit was filed in the present

case in the year 2006 itself stating that on account of decision to

abolish the post taken in the year 2003, petitioner’s promotion to

the post of Organizer cannot be considered.

In the supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner,

petitioner has annexed the yearly report of the year 2005-06 of the

Sugarcane Development Department of Government in which it is

clearly specified that the two posts of Organizer in the Sugarcane

Department is available which are lying vacant. He then has

annexed a communication of the Cane Commissioner, Bihar
-2-

himself which clearly stipulates that the sanctioned and

functioning posts which are available in the Sugarcane Department

include two posts of Organizer. Before the Court he has further

produced the recommendation of the Pay Revision Committee and

resolution of the Finance Department dated 21st January, 2010

wherein the revised pay scale of Organizer is specified. Petitioner,

thus, submits that only to deny promotion to the petitioner this

false stand is being taken whereas the post has neither been

abolished nor has there been any conscious decision of the

Government not to fill up the post.

Let learned counsel for the State take instructions in

the matter and file a comprehensive counter affidavit duly sworn

by the Cane Commissioner, Bihar.

List this case under the heading “For Admission” as a

zero item on 10th January, 2011.

Trivedi/               (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)