. 1.
IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA cIRcurr1£§é:N'CH :j:L_Vj:'
AT GULBARGA V
DATED THIS THE 13??! DAY 4' j= T 1}
THE HOPPBLE MR. Jusr1c1§'Li%,;_"sREEI5mti§
%
THE HON'BLE MR. Gowm
M.F.A.No.2229;'?é.§{>6 (MV)
BETWEEN: A AV & 'V A
In M.F.A. '
New India'VAss'u:a:§§;§¢: % "
Represented ' by 'Aast.=._Ma11age:.',_ '
Mission Road, . ._
Bangabfi»-27. _ ~ ...APP*ELLAN'E'
~ V. (BY SR;'{V.é i>§i3;V RAJU, ADVOCATE)
H
S10 Borax.
'C/0 Sifidailaa Gowda,
; _Sio. Gowda Patil,
Automobiles,
_ Opp; Sangam Bar, Béjapur Road,
Sindgi Town, Sindgi 'Taiuk,
' Bfijapur Disirict.
'. Dr. Prabhakar, Major,
S/0 Manikrao Kamahpuxzkar,
///J "
.5 //
rd "
1; V!' ,%I., m;,n_ mgr,
x V' Bm', Bijapnr Row,
V. ' " th, Majer,
R] at N.V. Layout, Vifial Nagar,
Gumarga.
3. Salt. Shantha Bai,
Both are residing at N.V. Layout,
Vittal Hagar. V. .
THIS M.F.A. is man U/S"-1'?'i1(1'}' OF "Marcie.
VEHICLES ACT, 1933, mavma T03 CALL Fm?' "m1*.~:
RECORDS IN M.V.C. No.1s5/2004, 'QN THE ms '\'.)F"'.I__'i'-i5',¢..IiI
ADDETIONAL cum. JUDGE (sg;'nvN.) " ._AN..'>= mar,
GULBARGA Arm SET __ASIDEV_....T'H_E'=._ORDi:"';R,_ DATED
21.11.2005
. " '' BETWEEN:
In M.F.A. No.223(}£’5$§)Qr§; i
New india ‘Asst1rax§cc _
Repmsentefi by Asst _ %
Mission R0951, . M
Bangak>x\c»27’.g – .. APPELLANT
3 _; ‘(By SR}. 8. PATEL, ADVOCATE)
Sic Liagappa Borgx,
C] 0- Gowda,
S/o Gowda Patil,
“Yasavi Aaitomabiles,
‘ Sindgi Town, Smdgi Tahzk,
‘ Sfo Hanmanth Sager,
Waniboy, Ashwini Hospital,
4/
Solapur, R/0 V.N. Layout,
Vittal Nagar, Gulbarga.
(BY SR1. sum-;1=:.=;R KULKARNI, ADV. FOR R-31- I ”
‘I’HiS M.F.A. IS FELED U/S 173(1) (IF. ~
vemcms ACT, 1933, PRAYING .CAL1’=; R0-R ma,
RECORDS IN M.V.C. No. 173/2004 0:31 THE’ FILE LLc)s:*LLfm1:’«V%%zI’ _ ;
ADDITIONAL cmz. JUDGE (SR. ‘:pvm* AND’ M;-u:r~,.
GULBARGA, AND SET ASIDE ‘rm: ‘ORDER. . DATED
21.11.2005. V
Thaw M.F.A.s day,
SREEDHAR RAG. .1, de}iv¢z1§€i«.thc-‘Vfo11o6v*Lng,;A4″A.
vouuu-an
Sri. MA Counsel has filed
Vakalath ” and takes notice for
Respondcznt Nfija. ” B. Patil, learned Counsel
”
1 are arise’ 3 out of the same
* Dr. Prasad Kaznalapurkar died in a motor which
‘ The ch1man’ ts are the parcnts. The dmsed is a
Bachelor. The income of the dcceased is assessed at
Rs.8,000/~ per month. The 50% of the amount be
defrayed towanis personal expenses, the ”
dependency would be Rs.4,000/- (hzcome) x ”
11 (multiplier) m 1=zs.s,23,ooo; «. M
entitled to Rs.20,000/– towards
Rs.10,{}0O/» towards funeral is ” L’
are entitled to a total 29f R.s.E>’,5$,Q(50/~, as
against Rs.5,43,000/~ with intenest
at 6% p.a. fiomwthc date» on the
enhanced _
14.9.5. :Ie_,a__g;;_g macs’ T V 2 _
One Chandxsimgiih. multiple fracture of right
u’13is’and Q The pefitriuner was working as Wardboy in
priveite» is to be assessed at Rs.2,10Q/-
The ‘ ifity to be assessed at 20%. Since
1’/2′ shortening of leg the pmpoxtionate loss of
ggmgmt ofdisability woukl be R3420/– p.m.
re–apprec1a’ tion ofev1d’ enee md facts, the petitioner
V.”c::;V1Vt:it1c:¢i to a compensation of Rs.40,000/- towards palm’
6
bearing No. KA~28[508}.-5082 is involved in the accident.
The Police after investigation have filed the Charge Shmt.
To prove the contention that the vehicle in quosi;io:o;”o..
was not involved in the asccilcnt neither the insurer not A4
owner have lot in any evidence. It is only 3
contended that the vehicle in quest1’ao11:.u_
the accident and them is a mention A ‘AI”racto ‘
bearm’ g No. KA-28/508}-5082 was fhe
More pleading cannot displace
placed by the fl_1c_– iowtolvomem of Tractor
bearing’ No. ‘AK the accident and the 331d’
fact is we}! {ho case mcmds.
of ti: matter, both the appeals are
@_.¢,~,4′ mi
‘ terns.
‘ : ~ R
sdI–
Iudge
Sd!-1
Tudgg
Rbv*