High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt. Kamalamma vs State Of Karnataka on 8 September, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Smt. Kamalamma vs State Of Karnataka on 8 September, 2010
Author: N.Ananda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 81" DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2010

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE N.ANANLlA._"4' it

CRIMINAL PETITION No.4477/zoioe  A

BETVVEEN:

Smt.Karna1amrna

W/0 Basavaraju

Aged about 48 Years  _

Resident of Gajanur A

Ma1ava11iTa_1uk    _  

Mandya District»:      A  '  ""i-;V.'--.PE'i'ITIONER

AND:

-' '~  _,  of~.K2arnateikéL';"' 'V
'  Ma.1_a'va11Vi"'Rura1 Police. ...RESPONDENT

H  HCGP)

 Cr1.P is filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C

 praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in
C1:i§§o.}6/2010 of Malavalli Rural Police Station,

Mandya district registered for the offences punishable

A   .,_..'c11'ld€'l" Sections 498-A, 420(B], .302, 20}, 304[B} r/W 34

IPC.

This petition coming on for orders this day, the
Court made the following:



ORDER

The petitioner is arrayed as accused No.4 in Crime

No.16/2010 registered for the offences

under Sections 498–A, 302, 201, 120(B) r/wee

also for offences punishable under ‘Sect:i__on_su of if

D.P.Act. She is in judicial custody, if if

2. This Court, while dealing with”aIiticipatory bail
application filed byl ‘accusledtog 3 in Criminal

Petition Nes.37e7_/1oeridi;3.7ea;(2o’1_o; dealt with the

matterlandu tiiecircumstance against this
petitioner is father of deceased came to

the gshouseauof:dec.eased”after finding that deceased was

‘ got ‘:’iri.’:hou_se arildmlenquired with petitioner she gave

A e*.:asi’=;re’

, Therefore, at this stage, allegations made

Saga-inst petitioner do not attract an offence under

Section 30.1 r/w. Section 34 of EPC or Section 120–B of

\/

IPC. The petitioner is a woman. She is not required for

the purpose of investigation. Therefore, detention of

4\>, C.” ” -/x—ti’/’-*”&9~, ,

petitioner during the course of trial would be a measure

of punishment.

4. In the resuit, I pass the following order: V v ‘u

Petition is accepted. Petitio:’ne1″.,’_i’::-oz ~ released on”b.aii,;_’

subject to following conditions:’

1) Petitioner shalt exeoatel:-_a”-»bonti” afiisum of
Rs.50,000/– v.l§V:1’11″_fV3ti€S for the
likesugfi; .150 jurisdictional

2) Petitioner”strati tamper with
the V

3) Petitionerxshaill regnlarlytattend the Court.

\\ get

m

3333!?

_ ‘Q