IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 35745 of 2010(P)
1. SAJEEB HASHIM, MUKKOMKADU HOUSE,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,
... Respondent
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
For Petitioner :SRI.J.OM PRAKASH
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MRS. Justice M.C.HARI RANI
Dated :02/12/2010
O R D E R
K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
W.P.C.No.35745 of 2010
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 2nd day of December 2010
J U D G M E N T
K.M.JOSEPH,J
The petitioner has approached this Court complaining of
harassment by the 4th respondent, Sub Inspector of Police. The
prayer is not to harass the petitioner or to implicate the
petitioner in false case. According to the petitioner, his nephew
has been implicated in a false case. It is also stated that his
nephew was physically tortured by the police. The father and
mother of his nephew filed Ext.P1 complaint before the 1st
respondent. Infuriated by the said complaint, the 4th respondent
is forcing the petitioner to withdraw the complaint and
threatened that otherwise, the petitioner will be implicated in a
crime alleging attempt to murder one Musthaffa, the local
C.P.I.leader, who is said to be a close associate of the 4th
respondent and is grateful to the 4th respondent for the arrest of
the accused in crime No.1620/2010 described above.
2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions,
submits that the nephew of the petitioner is the 4th accused in
W.P.C.No.35745 of 2010 2
crime No.1620/2010 registered under Sections 143, 147, 148,
323, 324, 506(ii), 149 I.P.C and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He
was arrested and enlarged on bail. The father and mother of the
nephew have filed a complaint before the Inspector General and
the Deputy Superintendent of Police, DCRG, Kollam is enquiring
into the matter. The allegation is that the 4th respondent is
compelling the petitioner to withdraw the complaint. The
learned Government Pleader would submit that the allegations
raised that the petitioner is forced to withdraw the complaint is
not correct. The complaint is filed by one Abdul Rehim and
Jamin. It is submitted that there will be no harassment on the
petitioner in the matter by the 4th respondent.
3. We record the same and close the writ petition.
(K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)
(M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE)
jsr
// True Copy// PA to Judge
W.P.C.No.35745 of 2010 3
W.P.C.No.35745 of 2010 4
K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ.
.No. of 200
ORDER/JUDGMENT
30/082010