:L
IN THE I-HGH COURT OF KARHATAKA AT BAKGAI./ORE
DATED THIS THE 27′?” DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2610
BEFORE
THE m:arrBLE MR. JUS”I’ICE Asnox B.
WRIT PETYPION No.so9o7%0z4~2o1{J ‘[LB’VQfE3 ‘1§rI?j’A. ”
E am HU Asnnaaomamium, sycmm " sums Trmvappn, R}§:31I3I1'IG L ' _
Hammw TJILLAGE,BAHGAI.{_>RE ‘ ._
anus (}ENERAI;P0’fifE}?’0F: %
A*r’noRNEY Hc>L;:>3R S.’s3HE£.AR”* A ‘V
syoa. SUR¥1%:NA§§AYA1iA_ %
RE’8ID1I_i_Q AT. EA’
mxmwrmflfisen M PETTFIGNER
& ADV2, FDR
SR1 3.sH1vAPRAs.m, .mv.,)
2 A. ….. .. V
uiwuvuhnm-un-
V1′ T ” vt§.c1~n}’xmas10nEE
mmmmm PALM,
A A ‘ mama omens
E!–iHL’2fi;LQRE-560001
3 1’32; cm? ENGINEER,
V “PROJECT N02, BEEP, 9TH FLOOR,
~U’1’ILIT”£’BUILDlING
H.G.ROAfi,
BANGALORE–56OC101
3 TKE ABSISTART CONSERVATGR OF FORE$’I’$,
PROJECT N03, Bfihli’,
9TH F’I.»%iR, U’I’ILfI’Y BUILIEIHG
hE,;G.RfiAI3,
BAHC?n&LGRE-560091 REf8PON})EN’Z'”S
(ravzsm LC}HI’I’H,ADV.,I«”C)R *
SRI:I(.R.!~”UT’l”E cmwm, ADWJ % u %
TI-I15 WRIT Plmmn 3 FILE!) UNDER AR’I’ICLE’ 225;
mm 227 :31-‘-* ma: uoxwsmvrrcn 9? mnmwrgnvmaym =
mam? mm RESPONTDEITPS . §3€.)HSIII§E’RV
REPRE8ER”I’A’I’ION GIVEN BY .. §’PE”IfITIGNER–..__ sag’
AN1TE:XE3’RE-P Hi AC-CORDARCE wrm LAW. ‘fHE?REAI~-TEE,”
mans NECESSARY nmxcrimgs Respanjgyzzrrai TC)
conmw THE ‘rrrLE (IF ‘l”fi1F2?”*E?’£)’T1’£’I0.HE1iS; A’HD'”AI..8C: ‘
HGT INTERFERE wmz THE pmcE:=’m, mssmsizcm ARI}
Enacmmrr 05* “gm $(.§§iEDU’LL–.§?ROPERTY.’
mm mmox iA%1~*’xgtfi9r’eq1ou1z£entsfo
aondder the imam given by the
pet£iwaerm’Anne2a¢re~PinacLaardm1ce’w:&h
Eaw. 1her’eeu’!er,£m¢ene::eammc£fire<:tio:.;sto
%zde21ts to confirm the titfie of the
HER
'3
pwtflionercuzdamnotinterferawithtke
peaaqmpammomwmmybyngmcyme
schsdaleprnperty. ..
my deemsfii umier the M
2. Heard Sri Vaandcv,
appearing for Sri f-:”.’1si”‘ géfitioner
and Sri Lohith, the for
Sri K.N.Putt§g;mrda.___
3, grievance is that his
repreaL§I1t.a.f.AiyiSi}.~_,’:’»-(::i1€stf,v¢C1 :.: 14.9.2910 (Annexure-P) has
remaizzeci
F’i’ft;ia ‘peiitian is dispesed sf with 3.
“tV.~.{j’:’tl1e rmpond-ants to ccmaider the
Vv .V pe€i¥’;i:§13Eeaf’s’.V’saaid repreaentaticxz in accordance with
as expediticmely as possible and in any
within an outer limit «of om: month from today.
HBH.
4
5. However, it ia made clear that the amend
part of prayer (a) is not grantable. If the petitioner
wants any declaratien in respect :1!’ the ~”c:>:
wants to seek injzmctivc reliaf, he
appmach the civil caurt by
smit.
6. Na crder mg to ma*;fig–
VG}?