High Court Kerala High Court

K.Mohanan vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011

Kerala High Court
K.Mohanan vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 38453 of 2010(F)


1. K.MOHANAN, ASSISTANT FOREMAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER
                       ...       Respondent

2. DIRECTOR PRINTING DEPARTMENT,

3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT,

4. K.K.SUJATHA, SENIOR GRADE BINDER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SIVAN MADATHIL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :13/01/2011

 O R D E R
                             S.SIRI JAGAN, J.

                       ==================

                        W.P.(C).No.38453 of 2010

                       ==================

               Dated this the 13th day of January, 2011

                             J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is an employee of the Printing Department of the

Government of Kerala. According to the petitioner, on account of his

association with a union of employees of the Government of Kerala

affiliated to the Indian National Trade Union Congress, he has been

subjected to some disciplinary enquiry, which is at the final stage. The

petitioner is presently working in the Government press at Vazhoor in

Kottayam district. The petitioner’s home district is

Thiruvananthapuram. Because of his family circumstances, which

includes an aged and ailing brother bedridden due to paralysis, the

petitioner is unable to shift his residence to Kottayam. Therefore, the

petitioner presently needs a transfer to Thiruvananthapuram District.

According to the petitioner, there are vacancies in

Thiruvananthapuram, to which, the petitioner can be accommodated.

Seeking this relief, the petitioner has filed Exts.P2 and P3

representations before the Chief Minister of the State of Kerala. The

petitioner presently seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider

and pass orders on Exts.P2 and P3 expeditiously.

2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also.

3. I am of opinion that in the peculiar circumstances of the

w.p.c.38453/10 2

case, it is only appropriate that the 1st respondent considers Exts.P2

and P3 expeditiously. Accordingly, I dispose of this writ petition with

a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on

Exts.P2 and P3, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two

months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

sdk+                                             S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

          ///True copy///




                             P.A. to Judge