IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.13632 of 2011
BHUNESHWAR YADAV S/O PUNNA YADAV
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
02 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the
petitioner and the State.
Petitioner is apprehending his
arrest in a case registered under rules 4,
40 and 52 of the Bihar Minor Mineral
Concession Rules, 1972 Sections 21 (A),
37(I) Air Act, 1981 and Sections 31 and 42
of Water Act and Section 379 of the Indian
Penal Code.
The accusation against the
petitioner is that the petitioner and others
operated the brick-kiln without obtaining no
objection from the Pollution Department and
has caused loss of Rs. 52,000/- to the
Pollution Department.
It is submitted by the learned
counsel for the petitioner that petitioner
never operated the brick-kiln and the
accusation does not constitute any criminal
offence.
Let the petitioner deposit Rs.
2
25,000/- before the learned court below
which will be invested in some Fixed Deposit
Scheme which will be subject to final result
of the case. On deposit of the aforesaid
amount, let the petitioner, above named, in
the event of his arrest or surrender before
the Court below within a period of 12 weeks
from today, be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten
thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Jehanabad, in connection with Makhdumpur
P.S. Case No. 352 of 2010, subject to
conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)
of the Indian Penal Code.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)
Safik