High Court Kerala High Court

M.Thaha vs The Ragional Transport Officer on 26 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
M.Thaha vs The Ragional Transport Officer on 26 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 23255 of 2008(R)


1. M.THAHA, AGED 55 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE RAGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNA MENON

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

 Dated :26/08/2008

 O R D E R
                         K.M. JOSEPH, J.

           ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                 W.P.(C) No. 23255 OF 2008 R
           ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
            Dated this the 26th day of August, 2008

                         J U D G M E N T

Petitioner challenges Exts.P6 and P7 and seeks

direction to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 representation.

Case of the petitioner in brief is as follows. Petitioner is the

owner of two vehicles KRZ-432 and KL-01/D.2088. The

former is a 1983 model vehicle with 42 seats and the other is

1993 model vehicle. This Court held that the maximum life of

a stage carriage is 15 years. Life of KRZ-432 is expired in

1998. Though KRZ-432 was covered by a regular permit till

29.6.2008, the petitioner could not operate for the full period.

Though renewal was granted, the renewed permit could not

be issued and replacement application submitted also could

not be granted. Petitioner submitted G-forms after completion

of 15 years. But, they were not considered or granted. The

other vehicle was not covered by any regular permit which

was being operated on temporary permit. The financier

WPC.23255/08
: 2 :

repossessed the vehicle and the registration certificate.

Petitioner submitted G-forms in time. The financier also

submitted G-forms. Those applications are pending

consideration. Now, the petitioner has been called upon to

remit the amount of tax vide Exts.P6 and P7. It is submitted

that application submitted by the petitioner in respect of

another vehicle which has been operated by the petitioner is

rejected. Exts.P6 and P7 are issued only to substantiate

Ext.P8 order. Petitioner has preferred an appeal against

Ext.P8.

2. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions,

submits that it is open to the petitioner to file objections

against Exts.P6 and P7 before the respondent and the

respondent will consider the same and take a decision

thereon in accordance with law and till such decision is taken,

recovery steps will be kept in abeyance. Taking note of the

submission of the learned Government Pleader, writ petition is

disposed of as follows.

WPC.23255/08
: 3 :

If the petitioner files objections to Exts.P6 and P7 within

two weeks from today, the respondent will consider the same

and take a decision thereon in accordance with law, after

affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and

communicate the same to the petitioner within three weeks

from the date of receipt of the objections. Till such time,

recovery steps initiated against the petitioner will be kept in

abeyance.

Sd/-

(K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)
aks

/TRUE COPY/

P.A.TO JUDGE