High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Rajendra Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 18 October, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Rajendra Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 18 October, 2011
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   Criminal Miscellaneous No.21678 of 2011
                   Rajendra Yadav, son of Late Kari Yadav, resident of village - Bakuniya,
                   P.S. - Nauhatta, District - Saharsa.
                                                                          -------- Petitioner.
                                                      Versus
                   The State of Bihar                               -----Opposite Party
                                                     *******

03. 18.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in

connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 99/2009 for

offences under Sections 147/148/149/353/307/171(e)

of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act,

pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Saharsa.

In this case instituted against unknown.

Petitioner’s name emerged during investigation.

Submission is that in the PACs Election some

misunderstanding might have been caused, but there is

nothing against the petitioner except disclosure of his

name in the extra judicial confession. Under similarly

situated circumstances co-accused Sudhir Yadav @

Sushil Yadav and others have already been granted

privilege by a Bench of this Court vide order dated

31.03.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6906/2011.
Considering the facts and circumstances of

the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a

period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be

enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs.

10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the

like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Nauhatta P.S.

Case No. 99/2009, subject to condition under section

438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and

additional condition to attend the court regularly at

least for two years or till disposal of the case,

whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two

consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation,

the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled.

( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)
Rajeev/-