Smt.Yasmeen W/O Akhaik Ahmad … vs Akhalak Ahmed S/O Allabax Mulla on 7 January, 2010

la.)

T O PAY A SUM OF RS. 1.000/M PIER MON'I'H TO 'FI"IE..E?E%E'ITf3ON¥:"lR

FROM TI"i{:"I DATE OF THE ORDER.

THIS RPFC COMING ow FOR Anmxsszor-2._:"mere" drug
COURTPASSEDWWHCWDMXWWNG:Wm» '"~.w =,~ , w »

oRoe3fOd

The petitioner        f 
against the respondent  tno11t.h1'y;.:n1attntena1_nce and

the same came to be the respondent to
pay monthly Subsequently, the
petitioner 127 of Cr.PC seeking
e.nhanc:er11ent;T’ot;’:*§mor1thhk ddmeinvifenance from Rs.1,000/~ to

–“_. on appreciation of the oral and

documentary *eVide1~.1,ee…-‘don record enhanced the monthly

«.._Ama:1’:n*te_;1:a13t_oe 1,000/– to Rs.1,500/- in the impugned

petitioner being not satisfied with the

awarded by the Trial Court has filed this

pet,ition_A.’1~

2. A perusal of the impugned order discloses that the

“l’rie:-:1 Court: by taking i_r1t,o ctormidera.t’.i<*~ii"~

".3 ii:

Pi*