High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Jitu Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 30 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Jitu Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 30 September, 2011
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                          Criminal Miscellaneous No.33446 of 2011
                           Jitu Kumar, son of Satruhan Goawami
                                              Versus
                                     The State Of Bihar
                                  ----------------------------------

2. 30.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offence under Sections 461 and 379 of the Indian Penal

Code. Subsequently, Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code

was added.

Considering that apart from confessional statement

of the co-accused there is no material against the petitioner

and he does not have any criminal antecedent, let the

petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the

like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court

concerned to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial

Magistrate, Masaurhi, Distt. Patna, in connection with Punpun

P.S. Case No. 39 of 2011, subject to the following conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how

he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake

to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the

petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the

petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he

shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also

state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the
2

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after

his release in the present case and thereafter the court below

will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of

bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will give

an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the

given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he

fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any

manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of

misuse. (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each

date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail

will be liable to be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali